• atmur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    ·
    4 months ago

    The frozen chipotle employee watching me walk behind the counter and make myself a burrito 180 times before time resumes

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    199
    ·
    4 months ago

    And that is why you should always test newfound superpowers on a small scale before blowing your load on freezing time for 6 months you depraved Anon

  • lseif@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    thats fine with me, since im not sick in the head, and i respect people’s consent

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sounds like the type of thing the sickest fuck in the room would say to avoid suspicion

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      4 months ago

      Didn’t even think about this. I thought of how crushingly boring and annoying it must have been to have been unable to move at all. For 6 months.

      And now I realize it must have been dreadful, at first.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        Imagine if your one of the thousands of people who would likely happen to have the sun in their eyes at the instant of freezing.

        • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          Good thing is that since time has stopped, you won’t get your eyes burnt since light stopped travelling as well.

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            As an aside, if light stopped too, wouldn’t that mean that the world would be plunged into darkness?

            Photons of light reflect off of objects, and into our eyes before being converted into electrical signals by the brain and translated into visuals that we see. But to do this, photons and electrical signals need to be able to move through time and space. So if time is stopped, and light is stopped with it, none of that other stuff happens, and we all would effectively be blind. No?

            • tetris11@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Photons would still exist, they’d just be frozen in a cloud. You could “see” things by moving towards photon sources, but you’d leave a black fog behind you, and would never be able to see the samething twice.

            • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The scenario doesn’t really make sense as the electro-chemical activity in your brain would be stopped as well, so you couldn’t be conscious.

              But if we suspend disbelief, you could say that you’re stuck with the image that got to your retina when time stopped. Which means that you couldn’t see the protagonist moving!

              Also, realistically, he couldn’t even move as he’d be against a barrier of unmovable air.

              • Match!!@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think a more reasonable interpretation is for time o have been slowed to an extreme extent: a factor of 10^6 would mean the 6 months of protagonist time would’ve been experienced as 15 seconds of bystander time, and light would be slowed down to about 1000 km/h, still substantially faster than a human can move unaided to avoid Cherenkov radiation.

                To avoid friction fires, we have an Alcubierre (warp) bubble of fast space out around the protag. Let’s say about 6 inches for reasons, and with a smooth gradient between protag time and slowed time. This is also necessary to prevent shear forces from tearing up everything the protag touches.

                This should handle most situations well: the protagonist can manipulate and interact with typical objects with their hands and other body parts without instantly exploding them or shearing them in half. However, humans that the protag directly interacts with will end up experiencing much more clock-time during the interaction, potentially even within the human reaction time of 250ms given a dedicated amount of attention.

                • bizarroland@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Okay but assuming the other laws of the universe remain in play, if light has been slowed down 186 times, then you won’t be walking 3 miles an hour you will be walking 3,000 miles an hour, and anything you do to people will be unbelievably violent.

                  Like if you walk into the shower room where girls are showering and play with their breasts, after time unfreezes they’re probably all going to die very quickly or at the very least suffer horrendous damage.

                  If you slap the kid that picked on you in 6th grade, his head may fly off or his spine may snap at his neck but one way or the other he’s most likely going to die.

                  And even after you revert time to its normal flow, everywhere you have gone is going to suffer multiple shock waves as the air your body has displaced and the vacuums you have left behind in your trail collapse back together.

                  Doors that you’ve opened will fly off hinges. Windows you have closed will shatter.

                  But thank God you chose only 1/1000th speed. If you had chosen 1/100,000th, you might have destroyed the entire planet.

                • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  but where do we keep the multiple stars worth of energy necessary for the Alcubierre drive? Something like −1064 kg converted to energy, I mean, I got pockets in my pants but I don’t think they’ll hold that

      • imecth@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And now I realize it must have been dreadful, at first.

        That’s basically sleep paralysis.

        • corus_kt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          So either six months of sleep paralysis or you experience six months of time in the instant that time returns, possibly mentally handicapping people from the sensation. Yeah, OP better go into hiding, anyone who survives will hunt them down - regardless of what they do.

        • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would have at least visited museums and the likes in cities I can’t afford to visit, as well as making food with all the tasty high quality ingredients I can’t afford.

          Maybe drive around on some expensive motorbike just to see how it feels. If my financial situation at the time was especially dire, maybe take a “loan” from a bank somewhere before unfreezing time.

          You’d have to be a saint to have that power and not do anything illegal. But one thing I would never do is fuck over regular people, only corporations and big businesses. After time unfreezes, those can recover from whatever I did and I doubt I’d but a significant dent in their profit margins, but regular people would have to live with the consequences of what I did, so that’s a no go.

          • shani66
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            A saint to not break laws? Laws are not morality, often they run directly counter to morality.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Eh, I honestly probably wouldn’t do much. If we’re going with the typical “time stop” rules where people just lock up and the days never change (trying to not think too hard about the physics), I would probably just work on a lot of hobbies that I don’t have time for normally.

            That’s really boring, so I guess that says a lot about me… Now I’m sad.

        • NormalPerson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Depends, what would happen if I stopped time in a moving car? Like if I were to stop time when that one car was swerving in and out of traffic, almost hit someone, then flicked them off?

          If I stopped time then would I still be carried by the momentum and splat against the inside of my car leaving everyone frozen forever or undo time stop and some freak accident is talked about on the news?

          Or do I get to stop time while they’re flipping the bird, pull their car off to the side of the road, take off their tires, fill their gas tank with sugar, then swipe their offending finger in their butt crack and leave it pressed against their upper lip?

          • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            If momentum was something to worry about, I feel like you’d have to worry about the movement of celestial bodies/etc too.

    • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Assume some people were around you when you froze time. They saw you did something and then were the only one who could move.

      Then they went through the absolute nightmare of being paralyzed and conscious for six months. And they know you’ve caused it.

      I highly doubt the whole world concented to this.

      Whatever else you did in frozen time barely changes a thing.

      • Tired8281@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        What if you spent your frozen time, determining the problems of everyone in the world, and solving them? So, when everybody got unfrozen, it was a utopia.

        • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          People may say “you can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs”, but would the eggs agree ? With hindsight you might become seen as a hero, but I doubt that would change the immediate hatred people would feel upon release from half a year of bondage within oneself.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Exactly. If someone mowed my lawn for me, that’s cool. If they tied me to a chair so tight I couldn’t move until they were done, not so cool.

        • weker01@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          One person’s utopia is another’s dystopia. There will always be people genuinely upset about what you did or what “utopia” you want to archive.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Dude you can get in trouble for doing a lot of things that aren’t a criminal sex act. There’s so much more out there! Doing H until you nod out in public, stealing products, playing guitar after 10pm, orchestrating dog fights, gambling on when elderly people will die, driving a type I school bus with a physical on file that’s two years and ten days old, the possibility are endless.

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would still steel shit from larger chain shops to eat an stuff so that wouldnt work out. Also i would test my powers first.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I respect people’s consent in the scenario where it’s something they experience or are affected by it. I’d imagine frozen time is consequence free zone for everyone.

      • jorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes this is fantasy but what you’re effectively stating here is that if you don’t get caught it’s not wrong. The same argument would justify groping a deep sleeper, do you think that’s not wrong?

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, not really. I’m saying that if there’s zero effect for the would-be victim, I can’t see them being wronged. I think time freeze is probably not the right scenario for this though. They’d be physically affected. Copying them in an simulation type thing is more along the lines of what I’d consider harmless.

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Unfortunately for me, I feel like if I thought I could get away with something consequences free, I’d probably do it. I’m not proud of that aspect of my morality, but I’d be lying if I denied it.

            That said, I remind myself that if I’m too ashamed to do it under the scrutiny of people, then it is 100% not something I’m doing. That goes for simulations as well. Because there is always a chance someone will find out… and frankly, I don’t think I could live with myself.

            Right or wrong, that’s my take on it.

            • jorp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s a very honest and self reflective stance that I think a lot of people would agree with. I don’t think it’s a moral failing, much of morality is putting aside your basic instinct and desire in favor of your rational mind realizing what’s best for you and society at large.

              People have empathy to varying degrees and it’s something that needs training just like any other skill. Acknowledging where you have gaps and working rationally around those gaps is how you become a moral person. I don’t think you were necessarily being hard on yourself but others feeling the same way might be so I figured I’d share this perspective.

              • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                Well thank you for that assurance. It’s a scary thing to admit to, especially when you see people around you who seemingly do not struggle with this sort of thing. The whole, “I don’t need a book/law to tell me what’s right or wrong,” are lucky in that respect.

                • jorp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I don’t think any individual is implicitly moral with regards to everything. I’m not suggesting everyone has the same hidden desires but I believe everyone has some instinctive behaviors and thoughts that they need to challenge rationally in some way or another. Philosophical frameworks for morality wouldn’t exist or be debated if it was unusual to need a rational framework for moral behavior.

                  Unless somehow every harm someone inflicted on another somehow affected themselves in the same way there’ll always be a selfish instinct that has to be overcome. If it was easy it wouldn’t be something to admire and respect as part of one’s character.

              • Mango@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Why should I put aside my feelings to protect someone else’s feelings who aren’t even gonna feel them for not knowing?

            • bizarroland@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I mean, I could see doing stuff like stealing an awful lot of money from large multinational corporations.

              Stockpiling gold, jewelry, and valuables from predatory pawn shops and stuff like that.

              I wouldn’t have a lot of personal grief over the theft of property but I would have to draw the line where it comes to interfering with people.

              I wouldn’t use time stopping powers to rape anyone or to kill my enemies or anything like that.

              Might take a few politicians and like royally fuck with them until they are so unsettled that they can’t function in society anymore though.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nah, people will judge you for totally harmless shit. Their judgement doesn’t mean you’re wrong. People hide their gayness or niche religions under the everything of people and they should not have to.

              • jorp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                True when will rapists get to come out of the closet. What an insulting comparison.

                • Mango@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Who said anything about rape? Also clearly you can figure out morality without it being external judgement. You’re coming at me with a chip on your shoulder.

          • jorp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            that’s another interesting but debatable position. AI generated deepfakes of teens fall into that category.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              So debate it.

              An it harm none, do what ye will. Every day bullshit harms me dramatically more than any dude privately jerking it to me.

              • jorp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’re once again relying on the fact that someone won’t find out in order for you to feel that you’ve gotten away with it. That’s not a moral act, that’s an immoral act that has gone by unnoticed.

                Maybe you’re not hurt by me jerking it to you but you’d be hurt by another violation of your identity like me impersonating you to call your mother names and hurt her feelings. Those are both violations of you, and they’re ways of using you as a means to a selfish end.

                Philosophical moral frameworks which people tend to follow include the idea that human beings shouldn’t be used as a means to an end.

                We can tweak your example to one where the simulation is of someone that doesn’t exist and there’d be even less to call into question, but maybe at that point you feel you wouldn’t get the same thrill… That thrill is a sign that you’re being immoral.

                You’re probably young and will hopefully continue to develop mentally and emotionally and will learn empathy, but your views here are problematic.

                • Icalasari@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I do get you’re trying to get at consent is key, but your argument is flawed in that using a simulated copy to insult one’s mom still brings a real person into it

                  Use a digital copy of me to hurt people, yeah I’d be upset

                  Use a digital copy of me as a sex toy? I’d be fine with that

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Copying them in an simulation type thing is more along the lines of what I’d consider harmless.

            you would have fun in the USS callister then

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Installing hidden cameras in a public toilet is harmless by that definition as long as they never get discovered, but would still be highly immoral. I don’t think you’ve thought this through. People’s right to decide what happens to their body extends to things like who can see it rather than just who can physically touch it.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Religious people all think there’s a god watching them 24/7 and seem fine with that. Those same religious people didn’t seem to think I should get to decide to keep my foreskin.

              The thing about the bathroom camera is that it’s like content piracy, and I personally don’t really care to engage in business of that nature. If you’re selling it, I don’t want it. I’m not more likely to pay just because I didn’t get it for free.

              I’m more concerned about the nature of law and enforcement in relation to this kind of privacy breaches. The law can and will act on shit, and they need to be as restrained as we can get them. I’m never worried about embarrassing myself around a rational thinker. I’m worried of embarrassing myself around irrational judgement from people who will hurt me or make my life worse. The only real situation where I’m not worried about being watched is by people who straight up cannot do anything with what they see. No talking, no sharing, etc… I don’t wanna hear distant snickers from people who know what I’ve put in my butt.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    4 months ago

    How would people know I’ve been in bed for those 6 months??

    As far as they are concerned the cause of the phenomena is unknown.

    And next time it will be longer.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Quick! Quick! Freeze it again! Wait… Actually never mind. After being frozen in place, and fully aware, for 6 months straight every single one of them is going to be batshit insane.

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s OK, they’ll know not to mess with me.

    Especially after the news cycles through hundreds of otherwise inexplicably brutal events like ‘oil company boardroom welded shut full of heaters’, ‘bee killing pestocide.producer found locked in a room full of wasps’, ‘putin awakes in room full people he’s been oppressing’, ‘guy who invented mobile game adverts could only leave his house after clicking on a very small button that’s actual hit box is slightly off the graphic’

  • shani66
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    At that point I’d just go all in, live in the just moment for a century and upend the entire world to make up for it.