Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of same communities on different instances, though?
I think right now we’re in the early days where people haven’t fully realized or understood HOW to use Lemmy.
I’m subscribed to 4 different Cleveland communities, but only 1 Ohio community. The Ohio community is far more active because there are less Ohio communities, if any others.
To me the power of Lemmy isn’t that it IS federated, but rather that it CAN be federated.
As in, Cleveland@instance gets popular. Then the mods get too uppidy. So Cleveland@OtherInstance can be created. That’s always an option to create another similiar community if the old one gets toxic.
But until you face that issue, why fracture the community???
Theres like 3 different pro wrestling communities on 3 different instances. All trying to be /r/squaredcircle. Except without the userbase. I say merge them.
We even saw this a bit on reddit.
/r/Nintendo got TOO active. To the point where you could make any topic at all. It could follow the rules. It could be on topic. There could be no issues AT ALL with your post. Instantly, there would be a problem. Your post would be removed, and they’d cite some rule that doesn’t apply.
So, someone made /r/CasualNintendo. With the idea that it was /r/Nintendo with a more casual modding style. Where your posts would stay up.
After a few years they had the same issues /r/Nintendo had. Too many posts. Too hard to moderate.
That would be a great example of needing multiple similiar clmmunities on different instances. If the userbase is in the hundreds of thousands, and it would make more sense to start a second community for the overflow, then you can.
But right now, I don’t see that as an issue Lemmy faces. I don’t think things should be spread out for the sake of preventing future problems, when you don’t have those problems now.
I like to think of it like a city. You don’t start building out the suburbs first. You build the city. Let the city grow, and when the city starts reaching max capacity, you build out the suburbs.
Also, forget roads. Everything is a single light rail transit car. The entire city, connected by a grid of rail. All using only 1 train. I’ve played Sim City on SNES. So I’m kind of an expert city planner.
Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of same communities on different instances, though?
I think right now we’re in the early days where people haven’t fully realized or understood HOW to use Lemmy.
I’m subscribed to 4 different Cleveland communities, but only 1 Ohio community. The Ohio community is far more active because there are less Ohio communities, if any others.
To me the power of Lemmy isn’t that it IS federated, but rather that it CAN be federated.
As in, Cleveland@instance gets popular. Then the mods get too uppidy. So Cleveland@OtherInstance can be created. That’s always an option to create another similiar community if the old one gets toxic.
But until you face that issue, why fracture the community???
Theres like 3 different pro wrestling communities on 3 different instances. All trying to be /r/squaredcircle. Except without the userbase. I say merge them.
We even saw this a bit on reddit.
/r/Nintendo got TOO active. To the point where you could make any topic at all. It could follow the rules. It could be on topic. There could be no issues AT ALL with your post. Instantly, there would be a problem. Your post would be removed, and they’d cite some rule that doesn’t apply.
So, someone made /r/CasualNintendo. With the idea that it was /r/Nintendo with a more casual modding style. Where your posts would stay up.
After a few years they had the same issues /r/Nintendo had. Too many posts. Too hard to moderate.
That would be a great example of needing multiple similiar clmmunities on different instances. If the userbase is in the hundreds of thousands, and it would make more sense to start a second community for the overflow, then you can.
But right now, I don’t see that as an issue Lemmy faces. I don’t think things should be spread out for the sake of preventing future problems, when you don’t have those problems now.
I like to think of it like a city. You don’t start building out the suburbs first. You build the city. Let the city grow, and when the city starts reaching max capacity, you build out the suburbs.
Also, forget roads. Everything is a single light rail transit car. The entire city, connected by a grid of rail. All using only 1 train. I’ve played Sim City on SNES. So I’m kind of an expert city planner.