I am not criticizing them, I’m just out of the loop.

  • kbity@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    237
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Fediverse is home to a lot of young, tech-minded people distrustful of major corporations. The younger generations are more likely to come out as transgender due to greater awareness and acceptance of gender identity and dysphoria, and a decentralised, open platform is naturally going to appeal to communists, syndicalists and other left-wingers who don’t want some billionaire buying the next website they get comfortable on. And funnily enough, there are a surprising number of trans people in the tech sector, to the point where trans-flag socks have become a meme among programmers.

    • nodsocket@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This seems like the most straightforward answer. But it doesn’t explain why people on the right haven’t come to the fediverse in proportional numbers. I know a lot of right leaning Libertarian communities, and for some reason they like cryptocurrency and FOSS but not the fediverse.

      • xapr@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are right-wing instances of Mastodon (gab, truth, and others), not to mention many Pleroma ones, as well as Lemmy (exploding heads, and probably others). It’s just that they get quickly defederated by everyone else for various valid reasons (usually hate and abuse, sometimes even child porn), so you don’t get to interact with them much. They just get stuck in their own bubble.

              • megsmagik@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                From this link it seems that almost no one is blocking exploding heads… and I just found out that my instance isn’t even blocking truth social 😨

                • Derproid@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Isn’t this just a good indicator that there might not be a need to defederate? If they aren’t causing problems for your users than it doesn’t seem right to defed preemptively.

          • Ibis@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m also on SDF. Can confirm that while we’re still federated with exploding-heads, I never see their content in my feeds. Ever.

            • Shit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Interesting. I wonder if the main community they spam in are just banned and not the instance. I got so much spam from one user who posted like several things an hour all day with no engagement on any posts when I would sort by new before we defederated. It was weird.

            • deejay4am@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If no one on that instance subscribed to a community, doesn’t it not show up in your all feed? Maybe just no one on that instance subscribes to any explodingheads communities.

              • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think this is the key. There’s no need to defederate if nobody’s subscribing to their content in the first place on your instance.

                Seeing a flood of content you dislike on your instance from another instance means there’s at least one person on your instance subscribing to it.

      • karmiclychee @sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        proportional

        Maybe they just don’t have the actual numbers you’d expect from their outsized presence in the discourse, when they’re not being protected, or facilitated, or actively promoted by engagement algorithms or the individuals who own the other platforms.

        (I’m pretty sure this is the case, but I’m too lazy to get sources just this minute)

        • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          And they have very few supporters here. If you allways get screemed at by everybody if you say anything you probably loose interest in posting. On those big platforms there are allways people who support you in what you say.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they have. It’s just they are so hateful and annoying that sooner than later they get banned or defederated. So they drop out of the face of the activity pub. Since no single entity can use an algo to force their views onto all users (ads or suggestion algos) they never resurface.

        And of course crypto bros hate the fediverse, it doesn’t let them force their ponzi schemes with ads or SEOed posts. And most people here were initially pretty tech savvy individuals, almost all actively hostile against nfts and altcoins. As for Foss, they only like that the software is free, the freedom ideology is just lip service for them, they don’t actually believe. Case in point, Oracle. Foss? Free for me but not for thee.

      • moitoi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        People on the right don’t see the issue with neoliberalism. They are mostly fine with all the ads based system and corporate making billions out of the datas. Neoliberalism tend towards fascism with time. They will prefer fascism to redistribute profits to the workers.

        The fediverse is a different point of view. You can defederate if it goes wrong with an instance what makes the profits by ad revenue impossible or too small. The big corps don’t have a huge interest in these platform without profits. People on the right will follow these corps and the platforms affiliated.

        On the left, people will federate. I recommend to have a good read about the fondation of the unions in the 19th century. People of the diversity will historically be on the left rather than on the right. Again, for the profits, the neoliberals will prefer to oppress you as a minority for the profits than to have social and societal consideration for you.

        You ends with the people of the left coming to the fediverse and the right on corps social media.

      • Rez9x@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am here and a big supporter of OSS, but many would call me right wing. I support living your life how you want privately and acknowledging different identities and sexualities, because if you aren’t flaunting it, how would I even know? But I also feel that sex, intimacy, etc should be private and should not be something discussed or displayed so openly, regardless of orientation, so many would label me as conservative.

        • beefteeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          ·
          1 year ago

          As long as your definition of keeping those things private includes heterosexual couples holding hands, giving each other a kiss, or showing off their pregnancy or kids.

        • milkjug@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You (and probably I) are going to get downvotes for this, but this is as reasonable a take as I’ve seen from any “conservative” so far. As long as you’re not actively promoting legislation to curtail or ban consenting adults from privately expressing their love for others in the ways they feel most comfortable. I hope you’re not against gender-affirmation therapies.

          • paenusbreth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue I have with this is that publicly expressing their love for others is an extremely natural and normal thing to do. Talking openly about your opposite-gender spouse, kissing or holding hands with your partner, going out for a nice date - whatever. These are all totally normal things which people won’t blink at when a heterosexual couple is doing it, yet LGBT people can still be discriminated against for these behaviours. That’s not even getting into trans or gender-non-conforming people, who can be discriminated against simply for existing and presenting the way they do.

            I don’t just want to ensure that LGBT people are free from explicit legislative discrimination. I want them to be free from social discrimination as well. Social consequences for being publicly gay are not acceptable, even if people aren’t in favour of more open forms of discrimination.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d argue the ‘young’ though. Polls I’ve seen, seem to show a huge 30-40 demographic.

      • MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ya, most young people I know that are not in tech are terrible with tech. They have only experienced EZmode and need shit put on a silver platter.

    • eldavi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      i think that’s why the fediverse is doomed to perpetual obscurity. my reddit-refugee addictions have taught me that only reddit has the content that i like and that i need to learn how to appreciate stuff i don’t like to get my fix; i wonder how people get started on furry stuff. lol

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trans people and communists are nearly half of software dev. The other half are furries.

    • nodsocket@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a possibility. Since the platform started off on their terms, it’s harder to convince new people of opposing politics to join the community.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A big part is because things like the Fediverse are aligned with the goal of Communists. Do away with the profit motive and constant rat race so we can spend time doing and making great things.

        Imagine if Facebook wasn’t interested in ad revenue and data gathering but truly sought to keep people connected and to facilitate communication. No bullshit algorithm, no manipulation to keep people doom scrolling.

        • ungoogleable@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          On a technical level, federation is arguably just as compatible with libertarianism. Each instance is its own island nation, free to set its own rules while members vote with their feet in free association. That it hasn’t gone that route is more to do with the founding population than the technology.

          • MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ya, the tech interests me. It feels like a version of the earlier internet where private forums and webrings were the norm. I like the native support for blocking things I don’t care to see as well.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of them seem to be centred around a few instances, they’re pretty easy to avoid once you have the lay of the land.

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s amazing what you see when algorithms aren’t deciding it for you.

    • sic_1@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’s that homophobia and transphobia are so dominant on more popular platforms that there is a natural migration towards more free and liberal platforms. I always wondered why you see more and more racism, hate and such degeneracy the larger a platform becomes.

      • Fisk400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s because leftists are, as a group, a lot less toxic and hateful. They are happy to be a tiny community chatting with each other about being a trans furry communist all day every day.

        The right on the other hand are, as a group, a bunch of anti social losers who thrive on hating and complaining about stuff. That’s not a sustainable platform because it’s either a miserable experience or it gets shut down for hate speech so they migrate around and attach themselves to heathier communities and complain about those instead.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s because when platforms get large enough Nazis (not metaphorical ones, actual 1488 self described National Socialists) start targeting them for recruitment purposes.

        If you know where to look you can see them organize in real time.

  • paenusbreth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The issue I have with this is that publicly expressing their love for others is an extremely natural and normal thing to do. Talking openly about your opposite-gender spouse, kissing or holding hands with your partner, going out for a nice date - whatever. These are all totally normal things which people won’t blink at when a heterosexual couple is doing it, yet LGBT people can still be discriminated against for these behaviours. That’s not even getting into trans or gender-non-conforming people, who can be discriminated against simply for existing and presenting the way they do.

    I don’t just want to ensure that LGBT people are free from explicit legislative discrimination. I want them to be free from social discrimination as well. Social consequences for being publicly gay are not acceptable, even if people aren’t in favour of more open forms of discrimination.

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why is there such a large amount of Nazi, fascist, conservative, Republican, and bootlicking related posts on other platforms compared to the Fediverse?

  • TootSweet@latte.isnot.coffee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    We might be able to answer the question better if you named the “other platforms” you’re referring to. It doesn’t seem like an unusual amount compared to, for instance, how much communist/transgender content Reddit had back when Reddit wasn’t as evil as it is now. (Who knows what Reddit’s like now. I haven’t been back since the two-day boycott over the API pricing.)

    All that said, some of the communist content here is tankies. (That is, authoritarian communists who spout CCP or other authoritarian communist regimes’ propaganda.) Some of the Lemmy instances (like latte.isnot.coffe and lemmy.ml) are run by tankies.

    That said, a lot of the communist content here is grass-roots anarcho-communist advocacy by people like me who ideologically lean that way.

      • TootSweet@latte.isnot.coffee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think the lemmy.ml admins have been coy about it.

        If you go to the lemmy.ml home page, at the bottom of the right column is a list of admins.

        The first admin’s profile banner is a picture of Mao. And the second’s profile pic is a photo of Fidel Castro. The other two don’t have profile pics that are explicitly authoritarian communist and I haven’t had the patience to look through a whole lot of their posts or anything.

        Just a couple of Reddit threads (via libreddit.hu) on the topic: one and two. Unfortunately what they link do doesn’t appear to be in the wayback machine as far as I’ve been able to tell.

      • bleph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. They basically say they are, and also run explicitly tankie instance lemmygrad.ml
        2. Look at the modlog for lemmy.ml. Among other things, anytime someone has an opinion about China who isn’t Chinese it’s “Orientalism”
        • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          34
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yet they still won’t let me ban the fucking libs invading the instance.

        • Ohthereyouare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Old? Just check most places on Lemmy. The amount of tankie alts is huge. They’re everywhere on Lemmy. I’ve only been here a month and it’s clear as day.

      • Historical_General@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re left wing, it’s a pretty good space. I don’t see left wingers complaining to be honest.

        The only evidenced complaint about censorship of criticism of China, was full of misleading bs that deserved to be removed to keep the community free of cancer. I’d have made an account there first, but they weren’t allowing registrations at the time Sync for Lemmy went down which is when and why I came here.

  • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I find myself to be a stereotypical Lemmy user. I’m trans, (anarcho-) communist, a programmer and Linux engineer.

    I’m older, I transitioned (ugh I hate that word) about 2 decades ago. I got into computers consciously and very intentionally. I knew I’d need to support myself soon and spent a good amount of time thinking what industries or companies might be willing to hire someone like me (this was even before trans people had employment rights in California!). I chose computers because I felt like it was an industry where someone might hire me, I could make enough to survive and pay for surgery, and because it seemed one where my co-workers would be less likely to beat me up or kill me.

    When it comes to communism, I have a hunch that being trans forces you to think about society and why you are not accepted, who is causing your troubles and why. It seems apparent why someone so low on the social acceptance ladder as a trans person would be repelled by exploitation based zero-sum systems and attracted to systems that would allow them to survive and thrive.

    Linux seemed just fundamentally awesome to me. You mean people could just choose to get together, coordinate, and build one of the most complex things to exist on the planet and give it away for free? Sign me up! I think Lemmy and the Fediverse are attractive for similar reasons.

    • Kribensis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for this. It was very well-reasoned, and gave me a perspective I hadn’t thought of before.

    • TriStar@lemmyfly.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s the reason. Trans girls just often happen to be good at IT and leftist.

    • Lilith02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was going to say because Linux is a big community on lemmy. And as we all know, Linux users are all either trans or femboys. /s

    • hikaru755@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I transitioned (ugh I hate that word)

      Slightly off topic but I’m curious, why do you hate that word and is there different wording that you’d prefer?

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not the person you’re replying to, but my guess is that “transition” implies some sort of inner journey, but transitioning is often really about changing how the world views you. You’re still the woman, man, or non-binary entity you always were, you’re just making changes to encourage/force everyone else to see you the same way.

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This makes sense, transition also implies I changed from one thing to another, which is how it appears externally I suppose but for me it was more like being let out of a prison where personal expression suddenly became possible. I didn’t change so much as people just started being able to seeing the whole me for the first time.

      • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure, I just cringe every time I have to say it. I guess it’s just kinda like referring to one’s puberty as “blossoming” and feeling cringe when talking to friends and you’re like, “…before I blossomed …”. In that case you’d more likely say “when I was a kid”, but I don’t want to say “when I was a dude” lol.

        It’s just a personal thing, no issues with the word or those who use it/like it. I don’t have a word I prefer.

    • ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do you think communism would allow you to thrive?

      Seriously, take a look at the history of communist countries and tell me which one you think you would have looked to exist in as a trans person 🤣

        • AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unregulated capitalism causes more harm than any other form of government not appropriately regulated. It’s worth more thought if you find yourself actively against it. We’ve been indoctrinated hard.

          • psud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So far communism had only been tried in small groups (where tribal dynamics make it work) and in Soviet and Chinese authoritarian regimes

            Communism ≠ command economy

            Communism ≠ authoritarianism

            Communism = a broad selection of idiologies more or less agreeing with the idea “from each according to their ability, to each according to their need”

            Several countries have such strong socialist policies in place that they could reasonably be called communist if we didn’t pretend that capitalism was opposite to and incompatible with communism. Capitalism is an excellent technology for extracting from each according to their ability.

            “Full communism” where you strive for perfect equality is probably less bad than “full capitalism” where you strive for full freedom of capital. Enough capitalism that you have the incentives it supplies and enough communism that those who won’t or can’t work are paid enough to live healthily and be in a position to seek work if they wish to, seems to be a good and reasonable position.

            I’ll answer the other part for the parent comment too

            If they fail to fit in to normal culture at work and are so unsuccessful at working, communism gives them a safety net.

            • They could have taken a risk and selected a job they expect to enjoy rather than one that will accept them if there’s a safety net
            • they could have selected a job they might enjoy rather than one calculated to pay enough to save for gender reassignment surgery if the state would pay for the surgery
            • they could have had the surgery earlier (which makes it better) if the state paid for it
            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’d be fantastic evidence if we could actually look at documentation of how these small group trials have worked out. Honestly, it’s the first I’m hearing of them.

              I don’t understand the word “paid” appearing in your third bullet point. Wouldn’t a communistic society operate without money? Generally speaking, what would a doctor’s motivation be to get 11+ years of medical school + residencies, then perform a difficult operation on a patient that has potential for complications and blame? (In a capitalist society, the motivation would be “Helping people” plus “Money”, tied with hospital-level protections against malpractice suits, but I’m curious about your answer)

              • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wouldn’t a communistic society operate without money?

                You could have communism with money. People still need a way to allocate resources and barter. I’m out of my depth here, as I’m a socialist but not a communist. However, I recognize that communism isn’t the bogeyman US propaganda (in schools, media, culture) taught me to think of it.

          • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            To give you the less complicated answer, communism is an economic system, not a form of government. Communism can and has been authoritarian, but it can also be libertarian or anarchistic. There’s nothing inherently authoritarian about an economy without money and without classes, based on need. It’s just the ideologies that want to (or say they want to) implement it in authoritarian ways that got to run the more famous socialist experiments. If you want to see how non-authoritarian communism worked, there are also historical examples of it, they’re just smaller and lasted less.

            Answering your question - in the period where most countries that called themselves communist existed, no capitalist countries accepted trans people either. But you are a capitalist nonetheless no? Huh, I wonder why.

    • Pengui@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahhh, yes, the good old anarchocommunism, also known as bigotry 😆

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People that are naturally drawn to fediverse tend to be:

    • self-hosting enthusiasts excited to run their own social media platforms, which are tend to be big supporters of FOSS
    • left-leaning idealists who want to get away from big corps platforms
    • pirates (arrr)

    So it’s not that surprising to see plenty of anti-capitalism and transgender stuff here if you consider this demographics.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the Lemmy software was developed by communist-leaning developers and they have, prior to the reddit exodus, had the biggest communities. As for the transgender related content, the transgender community was one of the largest to leave reddit for Lemmy.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if you’re transgender and your choices for typical ideology for cisgender community members are communist or fascist, the choice is generally going to be communist.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The particular “communists” in question on Lemmy are at worst naive idealists. They’re not calling for fundamental human rights being stripped away or genocide. They’re egalitarians – regardless of if you believe them to be misguided or not.

          At their core the “communists” on here are for the most part far better human beings than the fascists. I’d rather deal with their talk of “class warfare”, “eating the rich”, and hatred of capitalism than hearing about how queer people should be killed.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think forty-seven people would disagree that mods are to blame. That said, I didn’t see your comment before it was removed, so downvotes are my only evidence.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              People disagreeing is not the same as mods pushing their agenda.

    • AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder why disparate and well-meaning communities would leave a social media platform full of outspoken fascists.

    • Discoslugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Communists leaning is putting it lightly.

      The creators of Lemmy are openly marxist-leninist That why one of the biggest instances was .ml

      As in M Marxist L Leninist

  • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The more transgender related posts are mostly because 196 a very large queer and especially trans friendly subreddit closed permanently and migrated wholesale to a instance called blahajzone. If you look at r/place right now you can tell the absence of 196 by the fact there are very few queer symbols on r/place compared to last year where 196 and associated subs had coordinated artworks and defense campaigns for their flags. I’m pretty sure last time they managed to take over the American flag and force it to move to another spot on the canvas. Now there are two small flags and nothing else.

    • niktemadur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Potato - potatoe, tomato - tomatoe.

      You see 196 as

      queer and especially trans friendly

      I see it as a garden of shitposting delights.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? I’m pretty straight as these things go but didn’t know I needed that much queer shitposting in my life.

        💩🌈 💩🌈 💩 🌈

    • Wilker@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i can vouch for that as someone who participated this year. even maintaining a bunch of barcode flags on the canvas near the painting frame was difficult because of how little people we had.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the people that flock to these platforms first are usually technically adept nerds and free thinkers.

  • Bob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There aren’t nearly as many right wingers and fascists as social media makes you believe. Speaking as a Mastodon instance admin, every single time we’ve had huge waves of bot and/or troll signups they’ve been very clearly right wing accounts (almost all had similar bios) that almost immediately started interacting with and boosting each other as well as harassing trans and queer people.

    The thing about the fediverse is that it can’t be manipulated the way centralized social media can. So what happens is that it gets handled very quickly. They get banned and their instances get defederated so all they can do is shout into the void. They’re not, nor have they ever been, the majority by any stretch of the imagination, and most people have absolutely no desire to hear what they have to say at all.

    On top of that, a huge number of them are grifters, and they won’t get any engagement here. They can’t get the kind of viral outrage they need because most people aren’t even seeing their posts.

  • klay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    in a word, intersectionality. you’re getting people who were already looking for an excuse to ditch reddit and twitter, and of that group, you’re selecting the ones with the most tech literacy. That tends to overlap people with progressive politics.

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that a lot of people forget that collectively all the english as a first language countries added together dont add up to the population of china or india. So the algorithm which doesnt discriminate based on language just feeds us the aggregate.

          I try not to get annoyed at the tankies. If my government would fuck my life up and disappear my family for talking shit about them, Id probably play along too.

          • Ohthereyouare@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is actually an interesting take.

            And, I almost tend to agree. They’re awfully tough to digest, even with empathy. Their tactics are… bad?

            It’s almost like an abused animal that you’d like to help. But, it’s such a threat that you kinda have to leave it be. Every time you try to feed it, it bites and scratches you,and everyone around you.

            At some point, despite the empathy, you just let it starve.

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “extremist left” is a bit much to describe groups of people just trying to avoid harassment and hate on platforms clearly careening to the right, with essentially zero moderation, that officially respond to inquiries and concerns with automated poop.

      • Kaktus@lemmy.loomy.li
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What you describe is exactly what extremist left is. Antifa means nothing less then being against facism. Who isn’t except of facists?

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        i dont see how they implied any if the above to be “extremist left”

        it seems like you read “extremist left”, assumed it was referring to you and then got upset about it referring to you

    • SynopticVision@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the right answer. Of course marginalized groups tend to colonize new communities, because the big platforms, both because of their top-down structuring Nd because of the people who are on them, aren’t always welcoming.

      This is different from Voat tho. Voat was explicitly made to be a “free speech zone” i.e. a “let’s say nazi shit because nobody can censor us”-space. The fediverse’s idea is simply not to be dependent on centralised platforms, it says nothing about the content. If it happens to be left leaning, it’s because left leaning people tend to care more about stuff like right to privacy and centralisation.

      • jerry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really seems like all “free speech” social sites are really just places for racism to flourish.

        • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          the most universal and common limits to free speech that people will come across on social media in the west are usually an iteration of ‘don’t be an asshole’

          social media censorship is usually relatively lax on other fronts, and various sites will censor different things, whereas most every site will have basic enforcement of ‘don’t be an asshole’ rules

          as a result the most crying about free speech will come from folks who got told off for being an asshole and are entirely incapable of getting over it

          • MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think “free speech” and “don’t be an asshole” are incompatible. I do mostly agree with your take, there different flavors of asshole that are more tolerated than others though.