• GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why not just mute the phone while you’re not interested in being contacted synchronously, and rejecting calls when you don’t have the ability to talk synchronously?

    Wild take to be honest, it’s essentially the equivalent of saying that in-person conversations are rude and that people should send you a physical letter instead.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because some things warrant my immediate attention, and most don’t. I am never interested in being contacted synchronously unless it’s something actually urgent. And because of that I can tell people that if they need me, they can call me and if I’m at all able I will answer immediately, otherwise I will probably answer later, aka whenever I happen to see it.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah, it’s not like we have complex social rituals, informal rules and elaborate signs and calls designed to establish the appropriateness of in-person interactions. I just punch anyone in the face that I don’t want to talk to me, that usually gets the message across. And if I want someone’s attention I just scream my demands at the top of my lungs an inch away from their face. If they don’t punch my face I assume they are fine with the conversation.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I for one do, which I why my phone autoblocks all incoming calls.

      If someone knocked on my door without warning for a non emergency I would find that quite rude.