• WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I know nothing of his work, but my immediate assumption is that he’s just a contrarian asshole that has no actual principles.

    In media (as in politics), this kind of thing is almost always a product of cynical expediency rather than sincere introspection.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      He’s an old-school Regan conservative who writes a column for the New York Times. He also does a weekly PBS news segment; it used to be with this even older liberal named David Brooks (Mark Shields, what a dumb typo), but he retired, and now it’s with a young liberal who’s so moderate they barely even disagree.

      Funny enough, I actually don’t think he’s being contrarian. He was on PBS Newshour for their election night coverage, and he seemed shook. The next day, he commented on Twitter something to the effect of, “maybe the answer is that the Democrats need to pick someone that makes people like me unconformable.” I think he’s watched his economic outlook completely win American politics over the last 40 years, only to find the prize at the end was fascism.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Thank you - that’s interesting - particularly the quote about making him uncomfortable.

        I’m surprised that the shifting Overton window, which has left the Democrats far closer to Reagan than MAGA, (who are busy speed-running fascism) hasn’t swept up more Reaganites, but that boils down to naivete on my part, I think.

        Whatever the case, I certainly agree that the Dems need to move from institutional neolib/neocon positions to populist left positions, but that’s the last place the party wants to go - even when failure to do so represents an existential threat to the party.