Summary

Representative Sarah McBride, the first out trans congresswoman, criticized Donald Trump’s executive order defining gender as strictly male or female.

McBride points out that biologically all embryos develop as female until the SRY gene activates weeks after conception.

The order, which ties gender to reproductive cells at conception, unintentionally categorizes all humans as female from conception based on biological facts.

McBride’s remarks highlight scientific flaws in the policy.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Actually it being poorly written helps a lot with court challenge. That was one of the reasons why so much was overturned in his first administration. There was a fear that this time he’d sign better written executive orders that would survive challanges instead we’re getting a lot of them like this

    • cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The truth is, they don’t care how poorly written it is, they’re just trying to flood the zone with stuff, and they win no matter the outcome. If it’s not challenged, they have policy, if it is challenged, it occupies time and resources and most importantly, if it’s challenged unsuccessfully, they have legal precident.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        it is challenged, it occupies time and resources

        It also takes up their time and resources to which I say: good. Slow it all down

        They’d rather be able to steam roll through it all. Make them waste time defending everything so they can’t sue as much about things they do care about or move on to putting other things in effect

        • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This is where I’m at too. Even rubber stamping shit takes a non zero amount of time. We should be bouncing back anything that has so much as a misplaced comma, let alone shit like this.

        • cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          They have more time and resources as many of the challenges are spun off and subcontracted to their cronies. And they don’t especially care if things grind to a halt, that’s also a win for them, they can play victim to the public with it and scream about how they really want to get on with running a government.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Many of the orgs fighting them also aren’t governmental like the ACLU, the EFF, and other groups. Plus even localities like cities are even filing lawsuits against his EOs

            Biden had tons of his stuff blocked in courts and got all the blame for the courts blocking it. The public isn’t really good at paying attention to why something happened only that it didn’t

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah, Biden got blamed because his orders failed in courts that were stacked by Trump, pointing to it like it was a sign of his incompetence.

              Dems will be blamed for Trump’s agenda being stalled causing any and all problems for people stemming from his policies that do go through.

              They’re great at twisting everything against the Dems (and, honestly, the Dems suck at pushing back in any effectual manner)

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          No it doesn’t slow them down. They will do the fucking thing anyway. Why do you think they’d stop just because they used the wrong wording?

          Who the fuck is going to stop them?

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It has slowed them before. Make them have to keep rewriting it to survive challenges

            Make them deal with the companies who don’t trust the next admin won’t just go the opposite way. Apple for instance is keeping TikTok delisted from the App Store despite trump trying to extend it

            Make them have to deal with federal worker strikes

            Make them have to deal with local & state officals who won’t comply with invalid orders

            There is a fight. Don’t let them get away without one

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              It has slowed them before. Make them have to keep rewriting it to survive challenges

              How is it not already abundantly clear that this is not “before.” There is no precedent for what is currently happening

              Who “makes” them exactly? This is fascism now. The person with the biggest army gets what they want, and everyone else better shut the fuck up or die.

        • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It also takes up their time and resources

          It’s YOUR TIME AND RESOURCES! They do it on public employee time and with tax money. They are weaponizing the state against the people. There isn’t an upside to this.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            So stand down and never fight? Absolutely not

            There is a fight, don’t let them go without one

            Progress will happen at the local and state level. The goal at the federal level is damage control

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And every challenge is a chance to kick it up all the way to the Supreme Court where it can be enshrined as constitutional precedent.

    • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You think the supreme court won’t side with whatever schlock trump puts out? You should listen to a few of their hearings. The ones on free speech and transgender issues are specifically telling.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Not all cases make it up to SCOTUS. Massive numbers of suits are being filed right now, they can’t take them all up with just 9 justices. Many of these lawsuit are intentionally filed in places with more dem appointees on the district and appeals courts

        SCOTUS is insane, but they are also not in lock step with Trump. They have their own agenda that often align with Trump but not always. For instance, they just ruled 9-0 on the TikTok ban while Trump was calling for the courts to rule the opposite way

        We won’t we every fight, but there’s fights we can win. Use every tool we can against them

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          For instance, they just ruled 9-0 on the TikTok ban while Trump was calling for the courts to rule the opposite way

          https://newrepublic.com/post/190366/gorsuch-supreme-court-tiktok-ban

          “But the question we face today is not the law’s wisdom, only its constitutionality. Given just a handful of days after oral argument to issue an opinion, I cannot profess the kind of certainty I would like to have about the arguments and record before us. All I can say is that, at this time and under these constraints, the problem appears real and the response to it not unconstitutional,” Gorsuch continued

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The average intelligence of his hanger ons has dropped through the floor. Not to say there arent some possibly smart ones but those ones are probably having to spend way more energy keeping themselves sane, imagine being stuck in a room with both Trump and Musk youd have to expend so much willpower just to not go into a suicidal and homocidal rage.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        There are already groups that have pledge lawsuits on this specific executive orders. The courts don’t just decide to do a lawsuit, people and organizations

        Others have already filed multiple lawsuits on multiple of his executive orders. There’s 4 different lawsuits already filed against his one trying to overturn birthright citizenship for instance. ACLU, group of 22 state attorney generals, separate group of states, and some other orgs.

        Also note that they’re also filing many of these in courts with more dem appointees who are much more likely to grant injunctions, rule favorably, etc. This is a tactic called judge shoping that republicans have historically loved to exploit and now it’s being used against them. Most cases never reach SCOTUS so this stuff matters. SCOTUS can only take up so many cases with 9 justices and there’s already massive numbers of suits here