Her Instagram post, translated in the link:

“Come on settlers, we will slaughter you. We are waiting for you in all the cities of the West Bank. What Hitler did to you was a picnic. We will drink your blood and eat your skulls”

She has since been arrested:

  • steventhedev@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    11 months ago

    This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s one of many posts by influencers like the Hadid sisters, Mia Khalifa, and more. She’s an idiot, but she’s representative example of Palestinian sentiment at the moment.

    The children dying right now are the result of an unrelenting campaign of violent hate speech and teaching hatred in schools.

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can’t blame the children dieing on anyone but the people responsible for actually dropping the bombs and shooting the bullets.

      Violence is almost never the answer, and indiscriminate violence actually never ever is.

      No one but the children are without fault in this conflict, but still far too many (more than 0) children pay the ultimate price. You can wage war without killing children, it just costs more. But if you can’t pay that price then the war can’t ever be considered just.

      • steventhedev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        A 16 year old is a child, right? Let’s look at some semi-hypotheticals and you tell me who you think is to blame:

        • A 16 year old with a butcher knife who has already stabbed two people
        • A 16 year old being told to stand next to a jeep in the middle of a firefight
        • A 16 year old shooting a rifle
        • A 4 year old boy who is forced to be next to a senior commander 24/7 who holds the boy in front of him when the shooting starts

        War is hell, and it is complicated. Child soldiers will die, and there will be civilians caught in the crossfire. The is no track for this trolley that has 0 children. Any military has to balance the number of civilians killed vs the risk to its own soldiers vs the likelihood of killing their intended targets. If you expect them to sacrifice hundreds or thousands of soldiers just to avoid a few civilians, you grossly misunderstand how the world works. Most military forces will certainly be unwilling to sacrifice a single soldier for a single civilian, even on their own side.

        • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago
          • The punishment for murder should never be murder
          • The person shooting the unarmed civilian
          • If the 16 year old is engaged in the fighting and is a soldier then he’s no longer a civilian and thus fair game. The people putting rifles in the hands of kids and telling them to fight are to blame.
          • Someone using a kid as a literal meat shield in an actual firefight is an insane hypothetical. But shooting the kid to kill the commander can’t ever be considered the moral/just/right answer.

          You’re just apologizing for war. Why? What’s so good/important about war that you need to defend it? Why is it insane to expect nations to not kill civilians?

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Legally and morally yes in amongst every country. Including Israel.

          Ed: I should say according to the talmud no one is adult until 18.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Shut the fuck up, live in an open air concentration camp for awhile and see how you feel about the occupiers.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      is this the part where I tell you that that report was made by a totally non-biased Israeli NGO who’s entire modus operandi seems to be trying to discredit the UN via smear campaigns

      • steventhedev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Even if you throw out this report because of who wrote it, rather than looking at the content, there has been plenty of coverage of hate speech in Palestinian educational curriculums for many years. Even the UNHRC included references to it in their 2019 and 2023 reports. The EU was threatening to pull funding because of it.

        Don’t teach kids to hate.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I understand perfectly what you’re saying. Antisemitism is a huge problem. That’s not up for debate. There are a lot of stupid people mistaking antisemitism for “pro-Palestine.” Not just anti-Israel—which is the appropriate response— but for legitimate antisemitism.

      It’s like third wave feminist-come-latelies that mistake misandry for feminism. That’s not positive nor is it helpful. In fact it’s a problem in and of itself. And yes, this information/political identity literacy needs to be addressed.

      BUT. The existence of stupid people does not negate the fact that there is a systematic elimination of Palestinian people by the IDF/Israeli state. You can call that a lot of names, but to avoid likening this atrocity to any historical one for cleanliness of explanation, I will stick to that description: a systematic elimination of a specific identity group from a state/territory. This is the much larger, much more immediate problem that needs to be addressed.

      What complicates this issue and conflates these two issues (unnecessarily) is Israel itself, using the shield and cudgel of “antisemitism” to protect itself from MUCH NEEDED criticism and to muddy the waters of this discussion. When you put anyone on the defensive, having to fend off the label of “antisemitic” when they’re trying to criticize the Israeli state for the…well…genocide that it’s perpetrating on the Palestinian people, it furthers the decimation of the Palestinian people.

      And, again, to clarify, antisemitism IS A HUGE PROBLEM. And there are a lot of political-discussion illiterates debating this issue in 140 characters or on protest signs—all without much more thought than “I need to be on the right side of this issue”—which leaves no room for the nuance of making this clarification.

      Do you see what I’m saying?

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not sure that I would call Mia Khalifa a representative of Palestinian sentiment considering she is Lebanese. Bella Hadid has expressed sympathy for Palestinians killed as well as Israelis. Either way, the Hadids were born in the US.

      The children don’t right now are the result of the Israeli leaders and military killing them. It’s silly to say otherwise.