Baldur’s Gate 3 is a “mega hit” that Hasbro expects to pay dividends for years

  • xenoclast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Read: We’re just a clueless corporation but we intend to bleed this thing dry to pay for our yatchs.

    • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well hopefully it means more awesome Larian games though.

      Divinity was amazing, literally downloading baldurs gate to play with the wife for valentines as we speak, so I love them.

      But it probably won’t, it probably just means shitty magic crossovers and other horrible nonsense.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          9 months ago

          Give them Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic and the internet will go berserk

            • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              9 months ago

              At this point Bioware is just a skinsuit worn by EA. Once the skinsuit gets too stinky they will dispose of it and buy a new studio to make a fresh suit.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            If someone makes a new kotor game but uses the same extremely janky DND 3.x rules I am going to search my house for the monkey’s paw. That would make me so mad.

            • WadeTheWizard@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              Please don’t use the money’s paw. It will almost definitely change the game system to FATAL, and I do not, under any circumstances, want to roll for Zaalbar’s anal circumference.

        • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wizards of the Coast owner Hasbro, which says Larian’s “mega hit” RPG, having driven around $90 million in revenue in the last year, is a good sign for more video games to come from the D&D license.

          I don’t know them, but this seems like they have understood that D&D is beneficial to their purse.

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hasbro wants more games but that doesn’t say Larian wants or has been contracted for more. It’d be dumb for Larian to at least not make an expansion. Though I do understand expanding the level cap is super difficult and a LOT of spells will need to be limited in scope.

              • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                9 months ago

                In short, at 7th to 9th level spells shit get stupid really fast.

                In any case, the sweet spot of the 5th edition ruleset(which Larian vastly improved upon) is levels 5 to 10. Under that and you’re too squishy, over that and you start getting into the plane shifting and just outright death spells.

            • thepixelfox@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Larian said they were releasing a complete game. I honestly hope they don’t release an expansion. The ending was great, and I don’t know where you go after. An expansion past the ending would almost cheapen the whole game for me. After a huge build up to the fight of the netherbrain. It wouldn’t feel right to continue after that.

              And only getting to 12th level felt fine. I don’t think it needed to go higher. Mine abs my partner’s characters were beasts even at level 12. So it doesn’t feel like it’s necessary.

      • shani66
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        God i hope Larian never touches dnd again, they can do way better.

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    9 months ago

    Y’all ready for a decade of moderately to incredibly broken, brain dead, pushed out the door for a quick buck D&D games?

  • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I don’t think they understand.

    What made Baldurs Gate 3 great wasn’t DnD it was Larian. Same for BG 1/2 and old BioWare.

    You can’t just create that level of care by pumping out lots of games, they’ll probably fill them with MTX or GaaS bullshit to try and get more money from it as well.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 months ago

      The suits don’t understand anything. They see game making money and they’re like “more games equals more money”

      The shovelware tsunami is imminent

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Better yet, they see MTX games making money and D&D games making money, so they think combining the two will make even more money. I hope they’re wrong.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can absolutely license a crap load of games and be successful with it. Games Workshop does that with 40k. They haven’t had much that’s as huge as BG3, but the generally are reasonable games. Some are garbage mobile games, but a lot aren’t that as well.

      I doubt Hasbro/WotC can actually handle licensing out IP as successfully as GW, but it’s totally possible to do.

    • Diotima@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Concur. Larian is a breath of fresh air in a field saturated with pay-to-win, monetized, microtransaction nonsense. I’m not convinced they haven’t traveled across dimensions to restore fun and sanity to a hobby that has been all but ruined by greed and laziness.

    • shani66
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yep. I’d go so far as to argue the game is vastly worse than it could be because it’s dnd. If it was shadowrun? World? Nobilis? Hell, a high schoolers first BESM campaign? It would have been so much better.

  • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lmao without Larian’s dedication I doubt they’re gonna get anywhere close to BG3 in the future

  • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    Incoming Hasbro enshittifying every DnD game from now on with microtransactions and day 1 dlc.

    This is why we can’t have nice things. When they come along, the parent company strangles it for profit.

    Every

    Fuckdamn

    Time

  • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 months ago

    Loved BG3. but it was the hit it was because it was done by people who love the D&D world and didn’t attempt to live up to any specific monetary goals, nor did it rush out to try and beat some arbitrary deadline. it was done in the old style of development, by a relatively small team over long periods of time to showcase their labour of love.

    given the history of D&D the company itself and it’s more recent copyright monetization and attacking the playerbase for profit, I cannot see them pumping out other games that are anywhere CLOSE to what Larian produced.

    Wee’re going to get a whole lot of bullshit shovelware trying to ride BG3’s excellence.

    this is why we can’t have nice things :(

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah, the reason BG3 was so good was because unlike Hasbro and WoTC, they love the Forgotten Realms, and they love video games. If either weren’t true, it would be an awful game.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh god, they’re gonna Fox it up. Listen: dozens of cool shows came out circa 2000, did pretty darn well, and were thrown in the fucking garbage for not being The Simpsons. That show’s firehose of money funded brilliant new productions - most of which were cancelled for not instantly creating an equal firehose of money.

    This is how Firefly, Futurama, and Family Guy were shitcanned despite intense demand. But games don’t get revivals or movies the same way. They can’t be pulled back together with a writer and some key actors. Game franchises just die. Their original creators get scattered to the winds, and the rights get tangled up in a heartbeat, so anything with the same name is just an empty brand and inadvisable hope.

    Baldur’s Gate 3, in so many ways, was a miracle among miracles. And these geniuses are liable to expect that, every time, in ways that make life hell for any studio whose quality is merely exceptional.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Best we can hope for in game franchises are games that are made by the creators of X, but after Back 4 Blood I’m incredibly wary of anything like that

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Like 3 developers, and they based some of their advertising on “from the creators of Left 4 Dead” or some such phrasing. It is effectively a straight ripoff, but significantly worse

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Its on my list, and I’ve played Solasta (loved it, but they level higher than BG3 does).

    However, I think Pathfinder games do better Legendary adventures. The characters attain godlike strength in the end whereas D&D 5ed is not very good at that so far in the Video game space.

    What ever happened to games like NeverWinter Nights where you could literally do a raid on the hells themselves or Neverwinter Nights 2 where you can make an attack on the God of the Dead’s Domain.

    Developers complain about how hard it its to do spells and powers past a certain level and yet their predecessors still found a way to do it even if they had to make certain limitations on them.

    Still, I am glad to see BG3 a thing even if the characters are weak compared to the original ones from BG2.

    • shani66
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Couldn’t make those campaigns in the 5e ruleset, not well at least. Pathfinder and even older editions of dnd are much better designed.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Without Larian and without the writers of the core books yeah I’m sure it’ll be great totally won’t do a 4th edition again.

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That turned out to be incorrect. From what I remember:
      It was one news outlet in China, unconfirmed by anyone else, and denied by all parties mentioned as involved. It could have been malicious, but it also could have been a misunderstanding / mistranslation.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      With MTG arena they don’t really have incentive to make more games. Which is a shame because Duels of the Planeswalkers was fun

      • The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would prefer to see something that uses the IP that isn’t just a card game port. Something new. If MMOs weren’t all (Except for destiny I guess) hamstring by their own 90’s era hotbar mechanics, I’d think an MMO would be cool.

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Naw if they could make arena more playable to everyone i think they coukd have another winner on their plate

      • terwn43lp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        it’s a shame they removed planeswalkers from consoles, i enjoyed playing offline with a controller

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wish I could get into this game, but I’m so done with turn based fighting. I can’t take another game with that mechanic

      • june@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        That seems like it would make for chaotic fights. I’ll have to save and see what happens lol

    • shani66
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s very weird, but i do feel the same way about the 5e system. I can’t finish bg3 despite seeing the quality of it due to the shitty base system. I’ll never get why they did dnd. Larian could do so much better, they could have picked up any ip they wanted.