• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Having centralized solar doesn’t preclude a homeowner from also installing solar, and decentralized green energy has other advantages over centralized green energy.

    less wasteful

    Where’s the waste? If you collect more than you use, you can store it or send it back to the grid. If this is an efficiency concern (“you’re collecting less energy than the same amount of paneling would”), then it’s not really relevant as by that same logic, not having solar is “more wasteful” than having it.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The waste is if it’s truly decentralized then everyone needs to be able to provide enough for their individual peak while a centralized system can be made to handle the highest peak of the day for many households while also providing enough for people whose peak is at different hours.

      From a material requirement perspective being able to provide just what we need and not more is the most efficient. Batteries are great, the material required to make them still has a huge environmental impact and isn’t unlimited.

      • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If everyone has solar panels on their roof, you can still have the central grid and you can still share power from house-to-house, though.

        Generally speaking, decentralized solar refers to a centralized grid that is heavily augmented with decentralized solar, not “truly decentralized” solar.

      • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        This isn’t a nuclear reactor: one could have a bunch of PVCs on a solar farm or divided by 10 000s of homeowners.