“I was prepared to go on stage to craft a statement, saying he decided not to go on stage because of fact-checking… we couldn’t compromise on that.”

As [NABJ president Ken] Lemon was preparing that statement, Trump walked onto the stage.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “[Trump’s team] said, ‘Well, can you not fact check? He’s not going to take the stage if you fact-check,’” Lemon said.

    Amazing.

    “Can’t you just let him go out there and lie to everyone? Come on, aren’t you negroes team players?”

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      4 months ago

      you know it’s a cult when the leader says “i’m not going to speak unless i can lie with impunity” and people STILL support him

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well I couldn’t very well use the word they would have actually used, so I went for the closest equivalent.

        • HaleHirsute@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          4 months ago

          It would still be better to avoid that one too. I hate to sound like some racism monitor but it’s really hurtful to see it.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I am not going to let these racists get away with being racist. They’re racist all the time when the cameras are off. They absolutely use both words to talk about black people, even to their faces. And then Trump goes out there and just says a bunch of racist shit.

            Nope, I call it as I see it. I censored myself if anything.

            • HaleHirsute@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              4 months ago

              But… it’s hurtful for you to use that word when it really isn’t necessary to do so, even if it’s in a joke.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                If you can’t handle me using that word to criticize their racism, you’re really not going to be happy with the language used if Trump gets back into office. Because it won’t be that nice.

                • HaleHirsute@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s hurtful to me to see it, but I can see you don’t care about hurting anyone’s feelings, as long as you can make a post that gets attention.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes, that is the GOP candidate for President: a guy who doesn’t want to talk to you if you’re going to research whether what he says is true or not.

  • ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    That is downright bizarre!

    "Between the lines: In the aftermath, members remain divided on whether it was right for NABJ to extend the invitation and give a platform to Trump. Some said it was embarrassing; others praised the interviewers for their tough questioning.

    Brittany Cummings, a communications professional, was among the members who didn’t think the organization should have extended the invitation to Trump. “I’m not sure that any group of journalists has the ‘secret sauce’ to make him tell the truth and speak as a normal candidate would,” she said. “He’s not a normal candidate, so we can’t treat him as such.” “During the actual discussion, he was disrespectful, and I don’t think there was anything new to learn.”"

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      …others praised the interviewers for their tough questioning.

      I actually think they more or less missed an open goal here, to be honest. Sure, the overall appearance was probably a net negative for Trump, but it could have been way worse. They got him off balance from the start, but afterwards failed to push back when he started walking all over them in his responses.

      It’s clear neither of the hosts could handle either holding him to his statements based on facts, or pushing back against his loudness and personal attacks. They let him control the narrative way too much with stuff like “millions and millions of illegal immigrants swarming in from insane asylums” going unchecked and loud “nasty woman” rants bulldozing over the hosts.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    And I’m sure this was the actual reason for the delay, not the host’s equipment failure that Trump was rambling on about.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hah, he spent like 5 minutes on stage railing about them “being 35 minutes late”. I assumed it ws him being late, but glad to see that backed up by reasons (his lack of faculty to tell the truth).

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is how everyone should play it.

    Won’t debate on ABC? "“Trump won’t debate on platform where he will be fact checked.”

    Will debate on FOX? “Trump will only agree to debate on platform where he has historically not been fact checked.”

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    What a weird, old coward…

    *At the time, President Trump blamed the delay on audio problems. -Lemon told Axios, “There were audio problems, but they were resolved very quickly.” “The bigger problem was his threat not to take the stage when he had agreed to go on. He did not want to be fact-checked, but we could not let him on the stage without fact-checking,” Lemon said. Behind the scenes: The stalemate was so prolonged that NABJ leaders were prepared to explain to the audience of nearly 2,000 people why Trump would not appear. "I was prepared to go on stage to craft a statement, saying he decided not to go on stage because of fact-checking… we couldn’t compromise on that. As Lemon was preparing that statement, Trump walked onto the stage.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    He didn’t stall - he just had a senior moment. It’s completely fucking obvious he was intimidated by the journalists and just decided not to answer… actual stalling is slickly redirecting the conversation, he utterly failed to do that.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago
    Axios Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Name: Axios Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/axios/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.