• Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I just don’t get why they would target a van gogh painting. Because it was made with oil based paints?

    Why not target something that’s actually relevant to the oil industry? Like a Exxon mobil office or plane or something?

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because if they did you wouldn’t be pissed off by it making a comment.

      Scientists and activists have been drawing our attention to climate change since the 80’s, it doesn’t seem to be working so might as well try something else.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      To draw attention to the climate crisis because direct action against those responsible tends to be met with a media blackout, and they need to prompt conversation to get the public on-side.

      You think a painting will be relevant when we wipe out the majority of life on earth?

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yeah?

        Look at all the art we dig up from ancient Rome and even cave paintings that tell us so much about humanity and our history.

        In 1000-2000 years after society collapses from climate change and archeology gets back in business finding these paintings and other artworks will be incredibly important.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The fall of an empire is not the same as the literal apocalypse - it’s important that you understand that.

          I don’t value billions of people’s lives and the existence of tens of thousands of species over wiping some soup off a pane of glass (not even the fucking painting), and find it disturbing that you appear to.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The painting was covered in glass. They got two years for damaging the frame.

    The oil industry really doesn’t like protests and is cracking down on them through bribes, puppeteering and media manipulation.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Fucking children, just as I figured. Only a child would think this crap could do anything except drive people away from the very cause they support.

    They then glued their hands to the wall beneath it.

    I would grab them by the wrist and tear their hands loose. Oh, lost a bit of skin? So sorry, off to jail with your dumbasses.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Ooh! Look out! It’s an internet tough guy! Fuck these kids for trying to do something in response to the mass extinction event we’re causing!

      Here’s how easy it is to be tough on the internet - if I were to see you try that, I’d feed you your fucking teeth. Disfigured face, wired up jaw, and a skull full of dental implants make it hard to eat? So sorry - off to rehab with your overconfident arse.

  • spicystraw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I don’t support this kind of destructive protests. Yes you have managed to go into headlines for 5 min to highlight an issue for a price of destruction of irreplaceable cultural heritage.

    In this case the painting is luckily fine behind glass cover.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      …but they didn’t destroy an irreplaceable piece of cultural heritage at all, did they? None of their protests have. They got some soup on some glass.

      It’s interesting you’d fixate on blowing this non-issue out of proportion rather than the actual irreplaceable damage we do by creating mass-extinction events.

      • spicystraw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Hey, I wasn’t trying to blow this out of proportion. I was just commenting on what the article said. If you want to talk about how humans destroy ecosystems because of our greedy systems, I’m down for that. Just let me know, no need to be passive-aggressive about it.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Hey, I wasn’t trying to blow this out of proportion.

          …buuut

          highlight an issue for a price of destruction of irreplaceable cultural heritage.

          …when someone splashed some soup on some glass.

          That’s what you’re talking about, and I think it goes without saying, that’s both untrue and beside the point. I’m not sure there’s anything passive about what I’m saying.

          • spicystraw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Just to be clear, I’m talking about these kinds of protests in general. I also said that in this case, things worked out. But I can see now that you’re not interested in having a real discussion and just want to argue.

        • Lemming421@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Because protecting picture frames is more important than protecting the environment?

          • YourPrivatHater
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Protecting the environment? How exactly is damaging art helping the course in ANY way? Its literally driving people away from the course because no sane person wants to be associated with them.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              22 hours ago

              It’s a great way to stop the media from just ignoring the problem like they are paid to. The politicians are being bribed to bin our strongly worded letters and protest signs, this is just the next step.

              Stop being a mouthpiece.

              • YourPrivatHater
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Its not, everyone just hates on them and that’s the only reaction they get.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  No art was damaged, they got two years of prison and you said “good”.

                  Sounds like the actual issue is the people hating on them. It’s also quite clear that a big part of the population hates whatever the media tells them to and most media is in the oil barons pockets.