Divesting Android is still on the table.
  • ROAGO@lemmy.worldEnglish
    16·
    2 days ago

    Why is everyone acting like this is a thing that will happen? All they have to do is wait roughly 90 days and it’ll all go away.

  • mosscap@slrpnk.netEnglish
    31·
    1 day ago

    Trump will let this go through and behind the scenes force a deal where X buys Chrome

  • daggermoon@lemmy.worldEnglish
    42·
    2 days ago

    What company could actually afford to buy it other than Google, Meta, or Amazon? Unless they are forced to sell it at a loss, which is fine with me.

    • ArchRecord@lemm.eeEnglish
      441·
      2 days ago

      By “sell,” they could also mean ending up having Chrome just split off from Google, as a new, independent entity that is its own company, without anybody needing to buy it in the first place.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.eeEnglish
          61·
          2 days ago

          Selling user data, selling ad placement, subscriptions for paid services, enterprise-grade support contracts, and the like.

          They could also take an approach similar to Google, branching back out from being just a browser into a suite of related tools that Chrome can then convince users to switch to (similar to how Chrome gets users to not just use Google search, but also services like Gmail too.)

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        105·
        2 days ago

        The judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.eeEnglish
          5·
          2 days ago

          This is an order to sell, not break up.

          Currently, it’s still recommended actions to the court. Nothing has actually been finalized in terms of what they’re going to actually end up trying to make Google do.

          Google must not remain in control of Chrome.

          While divestiture is likely, they could also spin-off, split-off, or carve-out, which carry completely different implications for Google, but are still an option if they are unable to convince the court to make Google do their original preferred choice.

          A split-off could prevent Google from retaining shares in the new company without sacrificing shares in Google itself, and a carve-out could still allow them to “sell” it, but via shares sold in an IPO instead of having to get any actual buyout from another corporation.

        • underwire212@lemm.eeEnglish
          2·
          2 days ago

          Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea?

  • Corigan@lemm.eeEnglish
    2·
    1 day ago

    Nah I rather they not get deeply vested in figuring out as revenue…

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1311·
    3 days ago

    This is the last antitrust win we’ll get for years, isn’t it?

    I know Trump doesn’t like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      80·
      3 days ago

      This isn’t a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

      The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.worldEnglish
        10·
        2 days ago

        I keep saying this. In 2 months all this antitrust stuff goes out the window. If people actually bothered to show up on 11/5 Kahn and co could actually get some wins for the American people. Instead, we’re going to get more monopolies shoved down our throats.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.eeEnglish
      51·
      2 days ago

      Our govt is pay for play at this point, I struggle to see anything like this going through, especially so close to a new AG appointment.

  • 200ok@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2001·
    3 days ago

    Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

    I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      961·
      3 days ago

      Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

      • Tinidril@midwest.socialEnglish
        2·
        2 days ago

        I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don’t use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don’t take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor’s appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

        Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that’s not a problem either.

      • Beldarofremulak@lemmy.worldEnglish
        41·
        3 days ago

        Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about “Americans” they aren’t talking about us schlubs.

    • superkret@feddit.orgEnglish
      91·
      3 days ago

      The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
      This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

    • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyzEnglish
      53·
      3 days ago

      How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it’s own is not a business.

      Say you buy chrome, you have to options

      1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you’re in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

      2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

      Neither of these options are better than the status quo

  • Auli@lemmy.caEnglish
    1093·
    3 days ago

    Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

  • nutsack@lemmy.worldEnglish
    357·
    3 days ago

    sell it to Microsoft so they can finally have a web browser that people use

  • 200ok@lemmy.worldEnglish
    661·
    3 days ago

    If they’re allowed to choose who they sell it to this won’t change anything

  • Bosht@lemmy.worldEnglish
    451·
    2 days ago

    Just…please for the love of whatever diety do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

    • micka190@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      I feel like Trump’s probably going to axe whoever is finally tackling these monopolies, unfortunately.

    • xylogx@lemmy.worldEnglish
      195·
      3 days ago

      Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

      • Bosht@lemmy.worldEnglish
        162·
        3 days ago

        Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I’ll say what I’ve said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I’m all in. By what I’ve heard though it’s just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I’ve heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zipEnglish
          71·
          2 days ago

          Just going to say, I do those things too, on Linux, and while I can’t say I never have to mess with config files, it’s not frequent. And, the computer acting like it’s my computer rather than on loan from a megacorp is nice.

          It’s not all the way there yet but it’s so very close and the bits that are still pain points aren’t nearly as bad as the pain points of Windows.

          As the other commenter said, you should give it a serious try. Mint is very smooth overall.

        • Alk@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          51·
          2 days ago

          Hey I will give my anecdotal recent experience. Several months ago I switched to Pop! OS and have had basically no issues. I have an Nvidia GPU and I play a lot of games. I don’t play any games that are blocked by anti cheat (not because I can’t, I just don’t happen to play the few that are blocked).

          I spent the first day getting everything signed in, installed, set up and tweaked to how I like it with very minimal terminal usage. Mostly gui and clicking.

          Steam+Proton along with lutris makes it easy to play any game for me.

          Side note: I have 4 monitors of varying resolution, size, orientation and refresh rate and it hasn’t caused problems other than the initial setup (I used cursr to help with this)

          • Bosht@lemmy.worldEnglish
            21·
            2 days ago

            Oh God I didn’t even think about monitors. I only have one but it’s the stupid big ultra wide by Samsung. I honestly play most games in windowed. Wondering if there’s resolution support on the actual os though. The rest is like…5120 x something.

        • Zink@programming.devEnglish
          51·
          3 days ago

          You owe it to yourself to try it out! I recommend dual booting into Linux Mint Cinnamon for a while and have your windows install to fall back on to. That or one of the gaming-specific distributions, but from what I’ve seen Mint does all with gaming too. It’s a good all-around starting place, and there are a lot of resources because it’s popular and built off of the most popular distro. I installed it on my work machine (software engineering) and I’ve felt no lack of capability or a need to switch to a more “hardcore” distro.

          • Bosht@lemmy.worldEnglish
            31·
            2 days ago

            Thanks! Appreciate the type up and suggestion. I’ll add it to my list of ones to try out.

        • ouch@lemmy.worldEnglish
          41·
          3 days ago

          If you can live without games having invasive anticheat, then everything should be doable, and probably a lot easier than in Windows.

          • Bosht@lemmy.worldEnglish
            21·
            2 days ago

            Yeah not really into multiplayer competitive games. Indo play a lot of co op though. Will have to find a list somewhere.

            • hangonasecond@lemmy.worldEnglish
              41·
              2 days ago

              Proton DB is the place to go. But I don’t check 99% of games I play, unless it’s going to be an expensive purchase and I want to check before I buy. I also don’t bother with people’s suggested tweaks on proton db unless I actually personally experience issues. The only game I’ve had to tweak so far has been cyberpunk 2077.

              Edit: added context, I’m on 2 monitors and one of them is an ultrawide. Never had any issues that aren’t similar to issues I’ve experienced on Windows in the past.

      • Bosht@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        2 days ago

        On corp side and personal if you don’t have One Drive setup MS will spam notifications to set it up, and when you go to save will try to default to One Drive as opposed to local.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.socialEnglish
    361·
    3 days ago

    People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

    The obvious benefit is that they can default the user’s search provider to Google.

    But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don’t have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

    If they don’t like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don’t like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

    This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

    They’re doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

    Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldEnglish
    372·
    3 days ago

    They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It’s the only solution that doesn’t allow for corruption

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.clubEnglish
        6·
        3 days ago

        For a lot of things yes.

        However I do not want to use a browser developed by the US gov tyvm

        • Grimy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          3 days ago

          My comment is more in line with the corruption aspect. As much as I think they deserve it, giving it to the employees would be more akin to them winning the lottery. In the space of a year, they will have gone public, shareholders would have stormed in and we would be at square one.

          Nationalisation at least has a chance of getting rid of the money corruption aspect. Sadly, the three letter agencies are probably deep in every browser already so I don’t think any solution takes care of that.

          I understand your point though. Personally, I will never use chrome no matter what happens, ha.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        62·
        3 days ago

        Yep, nationalize everything that’s essential or at least offer a nationalized alternative and let the private sector try to compete.

        • Grimy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          31·
          3 days ago

          I literally salivate at the thought of it happening to the telecom industries.