• Monstrosity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    This isn’t going to be popular, but part of the problem is not acknowledging that 42%. It’s fucking insulting, frankly. Plenty of women voted for the bear.

    EDIT: In light of reports of tons of guys saying “your body my choice” and shit, I actually regret writing this & everything below.

    Like, what the fuck, boys?

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      52% of white women voted for trump.

      Chances are that many of the people crying about men voting trump, are part of a demographic that mostly voted trump.

      Trump apparently won the popular vote anyway. Most of everyone who voted, voted trump. But let’s focus on men and then be surprised that young men who are very insecure about themselves anyway, feel attacked by the left and choose the right.

      • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        18 days ago

        Please don’t get me confused, I don’t think it’s good this many men voted for The Stain. Also, 52% of WHITE women, but I bet if you combined ALL women, that number would drop dramatically.

        My broader point is, IMO, that 42% never gets talked about so why would it grow, yeah?

        Or, put another way, when I talk about women, who are my allies against the Patriarchy, I speak of why I like them (because I do, I LOVE women). They are resilient, strong, resourceful, grounded, etc, all the good stuff, and I try to include all women in that, they are my allies. I try NOT to focus on trad wives, manipulators, “gold diggers”, abusers, weirdos like MTG or Caitlyn Jenner , you know, bad people (and there are plenty).

        But when I hear about men in the ally space, it feels like I hear all about how awful and dangerous we are and that’s it. And there’s ALWAYS this group of guys willing to go along with it and point and go “yeah, we totally suck! You guys saying we don’t are the real problem!” But, how is that motivating to anyone? It makes me upset, anyways. Maybe I’m just a big emotional baby, who knows?

        Anyways, I’m blabbing. Bad habit of mine.

        • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I would rather kill myself than vote for trump, who is a sexist, racist and fascist.

          And I am with you. The boarder left is in denial that they are alienating especially young men with that behavior.

          • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            Meanwhile the right is actively recruiting young men. The name “Manosphere” for their recruitment cedes that ground to them with no resistance. “That’s just how men are, they hate women and vote for Trump because celebrities tell them to.” The right is actively selling their ideology to young men, the left isn’t.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              The left has nothing for them, the American left used to be racist and sexist too, but then they expelled the dixiecrats.

              Where do you think all that sexist racist scum came from? You think they wave confederate flags for no reason?

              • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 days ago

                The left has TONS for men. You think men thrive under the patriarchy? Not being able to express emotions, not being able to express fraternal love, not being able to pursue “womanly” or"gay" passions. Men have rarely been more alone and less happy than they are now and left wing ideology can free them.

                The left just doesn’t reach out like the right does. We could do a much better job.

                The online left also doesn’t do a great job calling out sexism and other behaviours that uphold the patriarchy when it victimizes men. That’s pretty shameful and it’s hard for men to feel safe online in leftist spaces. In person I’ve never had a problem and people have been wonderful. But it’s a barrier to overcome that isn’t there on the right. The right says “you’re amazing because you’re a man, join us and regain your rightful amazing place that your deserve”. That’s a hard message when one side says you’re amazing as you are and the other, the side that prides itself of being open and accepting, is proud to tell you you’re worse than a bear and you shouldn’t feel hurt by that because it’s what you deserve.

                • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  America enforced an ideal for men that they have to be impossibly strong, stupid, brutish, and horny.

                  It’s only over the past 20 years that that started to break down, but large parts of the country are still infused with those values.

                  Everybody is acting so shocked because they lived in the nice parts of the country till now.

                • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  The left has TONS for men. You think men thrive under the patriarchy?

                  The fact that you’re using the word “patriarchy” already contradicts the first sentence, lol. Your whole paradigm rests on a foundation of “all the bad stuff is ultimately male-caused”. It’s your version of original sin, except that ironically there’s actually a path to redemption for religion’s original sin. Your version can’t be redeemed–you’ll always see males as the enemy. Your worldview literally requires it.

                  The left has TONS of one specific thing for men and boys: contempt.

          • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            An I demographic blaming?

            Honest question, why so defensive? This post is demographic blaming, but am I supposed to go, “oh yeah I suck even though I am an ally.” Is that it? Is that what you want? Subservience? Or an honest conversation so we can move forward?

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              I just don’t know if its all that valuable. The real change is not that Trump got a bunch of extra votes, its that nobody came out to vote for Harris, the percentages largely are distorted on that basis. Latinos opted to not vote so trump got a higher percentage of latinos, possibly because of Harris’ right wing immigration arguments.

              The vice presidential debate where walz sat there and agreed with vance was the truth of this election.

              Women largely didnt come out to vote for Harris for some reason despite abortion ballot initiatives being largely successful. I’ve heard enough stories that its possible GOP largely just challenged every woman’s signature/voter status on every ballot they could across america.

              • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                18 days ago

                I see what you’re saying, and I actually completely agree with a lot of the sentiment. I think the real issue is broader than simple demographics.

                That said, if you feel like the obvious alienation men are feeling from allied spaces isn’t a big deal, well, I guess that’s something you can choose to ignore at your own peril. I don’t think it’s a good idea, but I’m just some stupid dude.

          • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            I could not disagree more. There’s a lot of dudes who really, REALLY hate women. I mean, that should be self evident.

            Also, to be clear, there’s very good, reasons for folks to be skeptical about inviting men into allied spaces. It’s complex. People are complex.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          18 days ago

          I mean, I’m out. Doesn’t matter what I do or how I vote I’m going to be called the enemy by the left anyway. They are adamant that I am their enemy and that they are mine. So that’s how it’s gonna be.

          • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Lol “I don’t want to be a right wing asshole, I’m only doing this because you hurt my feelings”

            Dude that’s the weakest thing I’ve ever heard. Being in the left means constantly fighting and being attacked by other leftists for being the wrong kind of leftist. That’s what it takes to be on the left and you never had it, it’s what the kids call a skill issue.

            Go be a right wing asshole all you want but don’t pretend you didn’t want it all along!

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              18 days ago

              Throw that on the pile of “See what I mean?”

              Being in the left means constantly fighting and being attacked by other leftists for being the wrong kind of leftist.

              Yes, I’ve noticed the complete lack of civility, and thus a complete lack of teamwork, and thus an utter inability to accomplish goals. “The Left” doesn’t get shit done, so what’s the point of tolerating the infighting?

              You come talk to me when you’ve figured out how to get along, work as a team, and are willing to court centrists into supporting you. And not a minute before. If you survive whatever’s next.

              • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                18 days ago

                The fighting ensures we all stay intellectually honest. It’s a competitive market of ideas that creates positive, progressive ideology. The fighting is also internal, when one of us is fighting the systems that oppress us we all line up to help in solidarity.

                Miss my with your pseudosuperiority and go crawl into whatever hateful right wing hole you call home.

          • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            I’m not familiar with the concept of an exit poll. I will look it up.

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              18 days ago

              An exit poll is conducted after a voter exits the voting booth. It’s conducted by a private organization (usually either a news organization or someone working in collaboration with a news organization) and polls people to find out how they voted. The exit poll is voluntary.

              Organizations can then categorize that info based on age, gender, race, area where they voted, and other details. News organizations can then use that info (along with a bunch of other data, including polls conducted leading up to the day of the election) to extrapolate who will win an election in a given area. Typically, despite being somewhat limited in their scope (not everyone at every polling location nationwide is polled), the exit polls are usually reflective of the actual election polls.

              Campaign organizers for the next election can also use the data to help figure out their strategies for the next election. For a general example (I came up with it off the top of my head), “We failed to gain the aged 60+ black male vote in this state. We need to study how to appeal to them better in the next election.”

              Fun Fact: The actual official votes actually take days to count. So these and other types of election polls really help news organizations predict the results even just a few hours after the election polls close, and they’re rarely wrong. Sometimes, they’re even able to call an election the minute the polls in that area close*. These news organizations often each crunch their own numbers, too, so they don’t necessarily all rely on each other’s data.

              *I should note that each state has its own rules about how and when they release election results. Often, to avoid influencing voters who haven’t voted yet, they won’t release results (including results from early voting) until polls in the entire state have closed. This is usually the case with news organizations announcing their predictions, too. That’s why some news organizations are able to immediately predict some races as soon as the polls close.

            • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              Why do you accept that young men voted for Trump. But when you’re told, using the same source of data, that white women did too suddenly you’re all questions?

              • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                17 days ago

                In my country voting is anonymous, how would anyone know based on their sex or color or whatever how anyone voted. Here, your vote is considered private so asking a person how they voted as they walk out the polling station is just a foreign concept to me.

                What’s even weirder is how you came to your conclusions. You really have to explain the mental gymnastics you used, because you’re really coming out of nowhere.

                • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  Hey, I think his point is rather simple and don’t require much mental gymnastics, if you are a little generous in reading it by ignoring how it is phrased.

                  His thought process is,

                  You saw the meme and there is no comment or expression by you towards how they knew men voted for trump. You seemingly just accepted it but when I express the 52% statement, you correctly doubted my words and expressed interest in how people would know. Why did the potentially photoshopped screenshot from some random news channel with similar information, didn’t trigger the same response in you?

                  Ofc it is flawed to assume that you weren’t wondering about that when looking at the meme. For all everyone else knows, you saw me as someone who could tell you as I was presenting similar information. So their hostility wasn’t proper. But the core of the question might be interesting for yourself, which is why I try to communicate it better.

                  If you weren’t wondering about the method of obtaining the data in the meme, you might want to reflect on why.

      • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        18 days ago

        young men who are very insecure about themselves anyway

        Nice anti-masculine sentiment. No wonder they voted Trump. You guys don’t hide your disdain as well as you think you do.

        feel attacked by the left and choose the right.

        Lol I wonder why…

        • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 days ago

          As a guy who used to be a young man and with a lot of young men as friends, retrospectively yeah, most issues were based in insecurities. You really want to be an adult and you feel like you should be one but you don’t know how to be one. You go out and want to meet girls and you are scared of the rejection.

          You can act like that is “anti-masculine” sentiment but it isn’t. It is an understanding of humans.

          Just as a sidenote, based on my experience every young adult is struggling with insecurities.

          • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            18 days ago

            Every young adult is struggling with insecurities.

            This is a totally different statement.

            You can act like that is “anti-masculine” sentiment but it isn’t

            Saying men are insecure when it’s the case across the board means it’s fair game to call you out. It sounds like fundamentally we don’t disagree though.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          As a father of a daughter?

          Those men need to go fuck themselves and die.

          I am horrified my daughter might have to share a world with that complete trash.

          • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            18 days ago

            Boooo. As a father of boys and girls it’s a HARD world for both right now. Completely different fights but let me tell you that my boys are suffering as much as my girls due to patriarchal expectations for their behaviours and the consequences of not complying.

            The patriarchy is the problem, not boys. Don’t let your fears push you to hatred of a whole group of people that are just trying their best to be good people. It’s hard for young boys to resist the messages of the patriarchy, that was half the message in the Barbie movie. We can hate the behaviours without hating boys. We can solve the problem by tackling boys and men’s issues caused by the patriarchy and dismantle it together. We can’t dismantle the patriarchy by alienating, scapegoating, and allowing ourselves to hate so much of the population.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              It’s hard for young boys to resist the messages of the patriarchy

              Yes, it is, which is why we have to shout that those messages are wrong.

              Or better we go back to being quiet and let the old conditions continue, you know, just to make things easier on everyone?

              We have to alienate them, alienating is defined as disconnecting, they must be alienated from what you call ‘the patriarchy’, and I consider a dysfunctional pseudo-masculine culture.

              I was just a nerd growing up, and bullied pretty much constantly, it wasn’t easy for me either, life is hard sometimes, but if we solve this properly now nobody will have to deal with it again in the future, and it’s destroying the lives of boys and girls.

              • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 days ago

                Dude if you’re on the left and you alienate boys and men you’re not alienating them from the patriarchy. You’re alienating them from the LEFT.

                The patriarchy does it’s own alienating by being shitty to them by forcing them into toxic ideals masculinity and cutting them off from their humanity. We have to provide a welcoming community. We PRIDE OURSELVES on providing a welcoming community for victims of the patriarchy. For some reason some people on the left think that just because the patriarchy is topped by a small group of men that the rest of the men can’t be victims or don’t otherwise deserve a welcoming space where they can work on dismantling the patriarchy with us.

                We’re destroying the pyramid from the bottom. We can only destroy the systems of oppression that affect US. If men don’t do their share we’ll never get to the people at the top. They’ll always be out of reach.

          • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            Then don’t be surprised when 50% of the population acts accordingly.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah, but there are a LOT of white women in the south.

      Absentee ballots are cool and all, I’m sure southern husbands and fathers love being able to ‘check everyone voted properly’.

      • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        I get your larger points, but do you really believe millions of women had their vote “verified” by their brother or husband??

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          18 days ago

          I 100% guarantee it.

          Understand dominionism, those men think they’re doing their job sheparding their flock.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            These are the same chucklefucks who still do purity rings and dad-daughter “promise” dances, yeah the attitude of women as property still exists in large swaths of this country

              • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                The religious wacko part or the voting? The former has been going on for a loooong time, the latter I think is a combo of voter apathy, intense propaganda and the result of decades of planning by conservatives who hated having to abandon Deutchsland for Argentina

                • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 days ago

                  The sensational headline you sought out doesn’t actually describe what these laws are in place for (but, hey, that’s why you lot always go looking for sensation headlines! Nobody ever reads what’s actually going on anyway!)

                  Oh I see. You just hate that men get any kind of thought in cases of pregnancy during divorce.

                  Women should be allowed to get pregnant (by her husband or otherwise) then divorce the asshole and claim alimony and child support based on their word alone!!

                  All of these laws are in place to give the husband at least a TINY chance to present a case for themselves. Even then, courts generally side with women anyway, so it usually doesn’t matter.

                  But whatever, FUCK THOSE MEN!! THEY SHOULD ALL GO TO HELL AND PAY ME MY MONEY!!!

          • GingerWitch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            but are those women so feeble that they just did what they were told? In PA MI WI??? This reeks of hacked elections.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 days ago

        You know, I read shit like this and even though they had their fuckups, I recognize my parents did some major things right. We had family voting might, amicably discussed the candidates and issues, and then they showed us you could knowingly vote differently and still be a loving family.

        Open fascists weren’t on our ballots until recently which made disagreement significantly more palatable. Talking about the rest of the ballot tho, honestly on some measures I don’t care that much and others in my family do. I’ll gladly lend my voice/vote on issues my family cares about if they’ll do the same for me (and they have).

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Open fascists weren’t on our ballots until recently

          Nixon was fash af. Reagan wasn’t much better. The white Christian nationalism of the modern conservative movement has been around for a long time

  • Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    18 days ago

    God, the whole of Lemmy is such a meme right now; the majority of women voted Trump as well!

    Lmao!..

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      The majority of White women voted for him 53% to 45% (not sure what percent of those are in the evangelical christian demographic).

      Women overall voted against him 53% to 45%. Funny how those numbers were the exact opposite. Anyway it was a smaller margin than Dems were hoping/expecting from women.

      source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/exit-polls

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      ya, but what if you pretend that women are some monolithic left-wing force that totally would take the bear, instead of people? the bear v. man is literally a left wing bubble thing.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        Its weird that the same group of people are ignoring women’s ability of independent thoughts and actions are the same ones saying (not unreasonably) the other side is dehumanizing women.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        18 days ago

        2020 had some of the easiest voting rules in US history, with universal no excuse mail in.

        Democrats were more likely to mail in votes than Republicans. So (largely Republican) states cracked down on mail in voting shortly after the election.

        The participation plunge you’re seeing is largely the result of that decision

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          So far second highest recorded turn out and it will be weeks for the final number. Keep in mind spoiled ballots will get added at some point (to the turnout count not to actually count)

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I think the ones who didn’t vote for Harris are desperately rationalizing to blame Trump on somebody besides themselves.

    • GingerWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah no. Either Musk or Putin learned how to hack without detection. It’s WHOLLY unlikely that majorities of women were polled, a gender gap was polled, and somehow that all magically disappeared. That is a STRONG indicator of hacking.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Either you don’t understand what you’re replying to or you don’t understand statistics… Or you don’t understand a lot of things.

        So I guess you voted for Trump

    • pinkystew@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      18 days ago

      Why would you use the word meme in your analysis if your problem is that the content is meme-like

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    19 days ago

    When Harris was nominated, I told a friend of mine that my biggest fear was it was going to energize racists and sexists because she was black and a woman. I though she was great candidate, but the level of racism and sexism in this county is beyond insane.

    • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      Well it’s a good thing your worries were unfounded then because Trump got 72 million votes in 2020, and as of right now he’s got those same 72 million votes in 2024. 10 million or so democrats sat out this election compared to 2020 and that’s why Harris lost.

        • rishado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          18 days ago

          Or maybe it’s not a simple answer? Have you considered actually thinking about what happened instead of looking for a zinger headline?

      • flames5123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Either that or states aren’t doing mail in voting since we’re not in the middle of a pandemic, so democrats had to work and didn’t get a chance to vote.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      18 days ago

      It was actually because they gaslit people into believing that Biden was a competent candidate until like 3 months before the damn election.

      THEN didn’t even hold a primary.

      And then let Kamala Harris completely train wreck the campaign and say shit like 18-24 year olds were stupid (notice how most of those votes from men for trump were around that age?) And sure, the video was taken out of context but she did say it and these dumb fucks didn’t care what the context was when they see that clip droning on their TikToks and shit.

      America does have a racism and sexism problem but to tell yourself that that is the only reason she lost this election would be lying to yourself in a very major way.

      I did vote for her too, btw. First time I ever voted. But Jesus Christ the democrats just seem like they don’t want to win at this point.

      • pewter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 days ago

        People keep saying this but they haven’t finished counting the votes. In California alone only 55% of votes were counted and he had 4,000,000+ votes there. The remaining votes could easily put him past his 2020 total.

    • rishado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      18 days ago

      You want this to be true because it’s a simple explanation, just like Republicans. Stop being so immature and look at the actual dogshit platform she ran on and think again. You just defined confirmation bias in your comment. Doesn’t make it true

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah, i think i’m swearing off white women too. It would be tough because i’m white as fuck but i’m considering it.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I mean, it sounds to me like men also chose the bear. Why did they choose the bear, is it because they’re stupid? Probably not, they likely just thought their odds were better with the bear.

    Dropping the metaphor, and looking in the cold light of day, those young men saw a better future under Trumpler than Harris. Articles signaled this well before, and nothing was done to address it.

    Will their future be better - probably not. Can they be made to think their future is better, that’s a tough one. Remember, you can trick one group of people into thinking they have more rights by stripping the rights of those around them.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.

  • NeilBru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    The “man or bear in the woods” question is obvious ragebait. Thinking people don’t entertain hyperbolic hypotheticals that are proposed to sow divisive rhetoric.

    The gender war is a psy-op proxy for the class war.

    ::: To be clear, I’m a proponent of market-socialism economically who wants a functional federal republic like we’re supposed to have on paper. I am not a “tankie”, nor do I want anything to do with them.

    When I say “class war”, I say we fight it with the ballot, and a gun if it gets ugly to the point of no recourse (that is still far away, thankfully).

    I mean, what the fuck are people gonna do against Predator drones with Hellfires? Be vaporized as cannon fodder? We’d be gullible rubes for the whims of the “enlightened LeAdErS of the People’s Revolution”, that’s what. :::

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Pretty much.

      In hiking groups, certain people bring it up, and it’s the kind of people you expect.

      The rest of us just go hiking

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      There’s also a TON left unsaid in it. Is the man armed? are you armed? Is it a hiking path? Is it the middle of the forest? Are you camping or just walking? what kinda bear? is the bear just walking or is it attacking?

      • lady_maria@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        You’re overthinking it; those questions are totally irrelevant to the point. Though, to be fair, the question doesn’t exactly specify this at face value.

        It’s really just a thought experiment: would you rather take your chances, alone, with a random bear/man in the woods? You don’t get a weapon. You dont get to choose which man or which bear, or what they do. It’s a gamble.

        • redisdead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 days ago

          If I’m in the woods, it’s because I don’t need nor want human interaction. Please pick the bear and leave me the fuck alone thanks.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 days ago

    I think in this situation it is probably more important to look into why more than half the population chose Trump.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s amazing how I’ve never ever seen a single thread on this metaphor and not seen at least two to three male users get furious and thus prove the metaphor 100% correct. Not once. Every single time. It’s like catnip they can’t resist it.

  • squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    2020 election.

    Its cultural, men are more likely to be Republicans. One day this will change

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I don’t know about that. We have to remember that people just didn’t come out to vote. Trump’s base is Trump’s base. It’s unchanging. People didn’t come out to vote, it’s not that Trump flipped people.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 days ago

        This is the real answer. Dems moved right again so their progressive base stayed home.

      • squid_slime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        sorry i wasn’t clear at all. but ive seen alot of mention of gender and i feel the polling from 2020 disproves this as its not massively changed.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 days ago

    That seems bang on average for the entire country. If anything that suggests to me that men in that age group are less susceptible to trumps influence since other age ranges of men were in the 60s and 70s

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      They’re so wrong to do so in such a vindictive way.

      … but that doesn’t mean they’re not doing it. People are petty, including men.

      • Brodysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m honestly not sure it’s even vindictive. Maybe in some cases, it’s a big complicated issue.

        We get such different news in the age of algorithms, they may not even see it as vindictive. I think it’s easy to pull back from a group that paints your identity as a villain, and I think that’s likely some of it.

    • blarth@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      They are choosing it because Theo Von / Shane Gillis / Tony Hinchcilff / Dana White / Joe Rogan / UFC / Russian propaganda / random MAGA streamers.

      • Brodysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think it’s too complex to attribute to one thing, I think you’re right that the alt right social media pipeline is real and an issue.

        I’m just saying I understand not identifying with a group who trash an identity a person belongs to. They just disengage. Nobody likes being put into a box that paints them as a villain.

        Just my opinion of course, the left (as a social group) can examine the current discourse and try to adjust, maybe like framing it as a class struggle or a liberty struggle, or continue being divisive and risk being overridden.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Trump learned how to win friends and influence people from Carnegie. People just want to feel heard, doesn’t matter what you say back to them. It’s essentially slight-of-hand, but for feelings and emotions.

        All those other guys know a cashcow when they see one.