• catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        94
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean, I can count how many times I’ve thought “damn I wish I still had wired headphones” on zero hands.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          68
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          My complaint has always been that the stupid things need to endlessly be recharged.

          I’ve got some AirPod Pros and they’re great… for about 4 hours.

          Then you’re stopping what you’re doing, recharging for half an hour, and then you’re good for uh, another 3 hours because that wasn’t a full charge.

          And after the 2nd or 3rd time you’ve done that, your case is dead and you get to throw everything on a charger for a couple of hours.

          Ooooooooor I can put in my wired headphones, and not give a shit about any of that, because that’s not how those work at all.

          I suppose most people don’t spend most of their day listening to podcasts and audiobooks and thus 4 hours is fine, but good lord is it annoying as crap.

          • Cenotaph@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            I had a similar problem. If thats your only limiation, check out the audiotechnica ATH-CKS50TW. Really excellent sound quality, the headphones themselves have 12hrs continuous use and the headphone case holds 24hrs of charge. Has full noise cancelling, and the headphones can be used independently of one another like airpods.

            I can wear them on the bus to work, all day at work, and then on the ride home and still have an hour or two of charge left over before I have to put them back in their case.

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            You have airpod pros but spending $5 USB-Aux adapter is where you draw the line?

            • snazzles@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 days ago

              But then you always need that adapter with you and you can’t charge at the same time

              • bjorney@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                You can leave it attached to the end of your headphone wire

                If the latter is a concern, there are adapters that allow this as well, which, you can also leave attached to the end of your charging cord

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 days ago

            Do airpods really suck that much? I’ve used the Anker ones for years, for about an hour 3-5 times a week, and I need to charge them… maybe once every six weeks? It’s infrequently enough that I hardly notice.

            • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              They really do.

              The sound great, and the ANC is great, but the “official” battery life for a brand new one (which these are not) is “up to 4.5 hours” with ANC on, and 5 without it.

              It ends up being 2-3 charge cycles basically every day, plus a full recharge of the charging case.

              They do, however, work amazingly well if you’re in the Apple ecosystem; for example they’ll swap between my iPad and Mac Mini if audio starts on one or the other.

              But for actually sitting down with something and listening to a thing, I’d rather just plug in some headphones (via the lovely USB-C dongle) and not have to think about if the stupid things are going to die before I’m ready to stop listening.

              (Disclaimer: I’m also a weirdo who doesn’t carry a smartphone, and still uses an iPod for listening to stuff outside of the house, so feel free to roll your eyes and disregard my obviously bad opinions :P )

              • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Sound great? Either you’ve never had a pair of cans on, or you might want to consider getting your hearing checked. The membranes in airpods are too small to recreate full frequency spectrum. Yeah, they’re more clear than the earbuds of yore, but they can’t hold a candle to my $30 Gemini DJ headphones. No, they don’t have any noise canceling, but I like to hear the car that’s about to run me over when I’m out and about, and if you turn em up a little you won’t hear anything else anyway. Never have to charge, and pure, clean sound including REAL bass and not some distorted “bass boost”.

                • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Might have been unclear; I listen basically exclusively to spoken word stuff. Podcasts, audobooks, “raido” plays, etc.

                  The Airpods actually sound remarkably good and clear (and ANC helps a lot with ensuring clarity anywhere even slightly noisy) with voices, so for my uses, they sound perfectly fine.

                  I have a pile of Chi-Fi earbuds that absolutely destroy them in sound quality for music, but it’s very much a 99.9% of the time it’s not music situation.

        • OnfireNFS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve never really understood the argument against headphone jacks. I can still use Bluetooth headphones with my phone. I can also use wired headphones and aux cables on my phone. Why would you want less features

          • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’d be fine if they gave us another USB C port, but inability to listen and charge the phone at the same time without using Bluetooth (which also needs to be charged) grinds my gears.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m not arguing against it, just not particularly arguing for it. Out of all the removed features, I’d want the IR blaster back. I can’t do that with Bluetooth.

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            5 days ago

            FYI “to each their own” was a phrase used on the entrance of a nazi concentration camp, same as “work sets you free”. Might wanna avoid that phrase in the future

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 days ago

              Makes no sense. Using a commonly used phrase has nothing to do with Nazis in almost any context despite the origin. No need to start making a list of things to change because of an old connection to something bad.

        • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Must be nice to either accept the objectively worse sound quality of wireless headphones, or be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price and just not care about it getting stolen.

          • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            6 days ago

            I care a moderate amount about audio quality, but my bigger gripes with Bluetooth generally involve the latency and inconvenience of switching devices (even with multipoint).

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            IDK about you, but in the environments where I’d use headphones with my phone are not environments where I’m capable of noticing the audio difference between bluetooth and wired.

            Ten times is an extreme exaggeration unless you’re really at the bottom end of earbuds. Decent quality bluetooth headphones aren’t that much more expensive.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            If I cared that much about audio quality, I wouldn’t be listening to music on my phone anyway.

            I’m not sure which product you’re referring to that’s ten times the price. You can get quality monitors for around $200. I don’t know of any Bluetooth headphones that are going to match that quality at any price, but you can get close enough for the majority of purposes in the same price range. The biggest issue will be the Bluetooth audio codec and the wireless link itself (signal strength and latency), not the sound reproduction quality.

                • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  If you going to complain about that, never listen to a CD or any other digital format. Let me guess, only vinyl is pure?

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price

            Or maybe just go buy a $5 adapter so you can use your wired headphones

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I dunno, how about the horrible privacy practices of most cars nowadays? Bluetooth allows connection, sure. It also allows data to go between the device and the car. An aux jack can’t do that.

          • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            An aux jack can’t do that.

            Really? Because there are aux jacks that allow for voice and volume control. Seems to me like they could make one for “real data”.

            • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Well, if they can, that’s interesting. But the method used to control volume and a mic are a hell of a lot simpler than transferring data. You’d need an expanded jack with extra circuitry afaik.

              At that point, you’re over to a usb cable, which is where all this starts.

              • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I mean, it’s all just electrical signals. They could simplify the data for such a transfer. The volume and mic do have an extra wire or two in them, but those are still made no bigger than those without, and the jack just has an extra ring or two on it for the connection. Most everybody is oblivious to the presence of those rings. So, I would say it’s totally possible, but is it worth it money-and-effort-wise?

                • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Well, there’s a difference between analog and digital. So, no matter how you cut it, if the aux jack is there, making it do double duty is essentially turning it into a usb port.

                  You can’t really send much data at any kind of useful speed over the size and types of wiring in even the more complicated headphone wires, which usually aren’t even present in an actual aux cord that’s got a plug on each end.

                  The level of data transfer over Bluetooth is both higher, and is already set up to move data like the cars nowadays scrape.

                  So, while it would conceivably be possible to make new aux cords that are beefed up to do it, and make the jacks in both phones/tablets and head units interpret the signals, it isn’t so much whether or not it’s worth it money wise, it’s will the car owners and passengers buy it?

                  The connectors, as is, have a limited number of connections, poles. To change that, you have to make the plugs and jacks bigger, or radically redesign them.

                  From a “worth it” standpoint, they’re already taking the cheaper way out of trying to force everyone to use the Bluetooth that’s already built in. Get device makers to stop having jacks, stop putting them in cars, and the problem is solved on their end. It then falls to the consumer to find a way around that.

        • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.idM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          To be honest, I’ve used Bluetooth headphones before Android was even a thing (stupid W850i proprietary ports and all) and love them.

          However, dickhead here just put my Soundcore buds through the wash so there is argument for me having a backup which this Poco F6 is now lacking.

          It’s a silly divisive topic IMO which is never gonna be solved when blog authors put out articles like the above.

          :(

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not crazy to want to keep using your excellent wired headphones and not rely on battery powered bullshit

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I have a pair of Etymotics that i have had for 20 years, ficks no 3.5mm jack. Have a Nokia phone I use that has uSD and earphone jack.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        It is when you act like adapters don’t exist

        This is written by someone who’s using IEMs on a pixel, this weird obsession with jacks on the phones should have died years ago

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          They turn a robust connector into a fragile piece of shit, 1/2 ass’d compromise is the best description.

        • zod000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m using IEMs on a pixel too, with a jack as intended not some bullshit dongle.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      My daily driver is a Poco F2 Pro which has the jack port.

      My car is old and I still wire it to the speakers for using Spotify and such, my gf has to use the adapter thingy for her iPhone and she can’t charge and play music at the same time, I can do that without an issue.

      Too bad companies keep getting rid of ports.

      • Ranta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        A fellow F2 Pro owner here. I don’t have use for the aux port that often, but whenever I do, it’s great! Older cars, mixers, etc, everything is just plug and play like it should be.

        However the notorious charging port ribbon cable seems to have broken again and this might be some of the last things I write with the phone :(

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          However the notorious charging port ribbon cable seems to have broken again and this might be some of the last things I write with the phone :(

          Yeah, that is one annoying issue for sure.

          It happened to mine as well, what I did year (years?) ago, was to use a tiny piece of electric tape in the flex to make pressure and make it to recognize the charger as well…

          Still working fine after that.

          If your device stops recognizing data I think it is game over though.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        There are adapters with charger throughput. Or else a car phone holder with wireless charging capability that’s connected to the cigarette lighter port will do the trick.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      I just got a USB-C to 3.5" adapter and done. The phones listed here are either overpriced or shit.

      • Retrograde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Extremely hard disagree. Have you used a modern Sony phone before? What makes the Sony over priced compared to it’s Apple, Samsung or Google counterparts?

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I’ve used older Xperia phones, not new ones. But a list price of 1400 bucks is by default overpriced. Samsungs are so full of bloat and proprietary shit, I wouldn’t touch them, ever. Plus their bootloader can’t be unlocked, which is heavily restricting my use cases.

          Wouldn’t ever touch Apple devices either, and while Pixel phones are great, the price points of the new 9 Pro at around 900 bucks is high, but barely in acceptable range for me. Don’t have one (still happy with my OnePlus 10 Pro, that was about 650 bucks I think), but that’s the only high end brand you mentioned that I would consider if I were to upgrade at this point.

    • skribe@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      A15 + 5g both have a headphone jack and can be unlocked apparently. Probably the A25 versions too.

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Useful advice

        Edit: it appears that this is only accurate for the models not sold in North America

  • MaXimus421@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I stopped caring about the headphone jack when every pair I used, the wire eventually wore out. Having to buy more every couple months was getting old. I’d rather recharge my Airpods every 4 or 5 hours for 45 mins than continue buying wired headphones repeatedly for enternity.

    But that’s just my personal experience. I use headphones at work, so obviously with all the constant moving around, it was hard on the wires. I don’t wish for the jack to be removed but I will never use it again for my purposes.

  • ByteMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    I would love buying a Sony Xperia if it had a better update policy and wasn’t that expensive

    • Mrrdrr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This one has TWO headphone ports!

      • I love the official brochure for the camera: “It’s not good but it works”.

      Edit: Damn you, you edited the thing i said while i was writing it. :D

    • DoeJohn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Looks pretty great, though I’d never buy it due to the lack of software support. I wish that developers making these phones would just allow easy bootloader unlock and give the device trees needed for custom roms. The community would do the rest, just like Xiaomi phones in the old days.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yep it’s right there, no clue how I missed it. I shot right to the bottom of the page looking for it, didn’t even think to check the top. Thanks

    • Retrograde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sony has both! I’m rocking a 1tb SD card at the moment that I swap into my drone and laptop for quick file transfer and it’s amazing.

          • viking@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Right, that’s true. My main concern is that I need to work with 3 SIM cards regularly (German, Chinese, Malaysian) and already have to either hot swap or use a spare phone, so I’d really want to see a phone that offers a standalone SD slot without compromising at least dual SIM.

            I’ve just got myself one of the aftermarket eSIM add-on cards from 5ber.com which seems to be working fine, but both my Malaysian and Chinese ISP don’t offer the functionality at all just yet. Ideally I’d want to have all 3 profiles on one, then the dual SIM wouldn’t be as needed as it is now.

            • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              So technically if a phone has a dual SIM slot where the second slot is shared between SD card or SIM, you can still use both SIMs and an SD card. There are little adapter ribbons that allow you to do so. One of my previous phones was a Huawei Mate 8 that I did that with.

              • viking@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Would that all still fit into the SIM slot, or will the card dangle outside? Sounds interesting for sure, I’ll have a look.

                Currently I’m using an external SSD that I can plug into the USB-C port, but it’s a bit bulky even with a small form factor.

                • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  One of the cards dangles out, and you do sometimes have to file the SIM tray down a hair (just the tray the slot/phone is not modified at all). A lot of the ribbons have an adhesive back and just enough length to curve around the body of the phone so that it contours the phone and sticks to the back.

                  Since I kept my phone in a case it was essentially indistinguishable/seamless to me.

                  Below is a link to an example of the adapter I’m talking about.

                  https://www.amazon.com/Adapter-Android-Extender-Samsung-Accessory/dp/B0C5FCZY71

            • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I don’t know any phone that has dualsim and micro SD, but Sony atleast offer a toolless sim tray, so you don’t need a needle to remove it

              • Dutchie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Motorola E32 dual sim + micro SD. My old Nokia 3.1 had it also. Both have s 3,5mm headset jack

                • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  That’s pretty cool, but I get why most manufacturers don’t make that. Do you have 2 simtrays or 1 large one?

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Moto stylus 5g has both. The review said it had bloatware, but it had way less than my S9 or z fold 4. It’s running pretty lean out of the box, with just a few moto apps you don’t really need.

  • Tenkard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have a Samsung xcover 6 pro. It has the jack + 2 sims + 1 microsd + removable battery

    • Mrrdrr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      I got the Xperia 1 VI, the headphone port seriously lacks power. It’s like half of what i’d expect from a phone. They might have bent a knee to some EU regulation. All my older cheaper phones could drive my larger cans, this one doesn’t leave much headroom.

    • No1@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Sony

      Can’t trust them ever again. Had an XZ Premium, and they took away Miracast in an update.

      And I’m still not over them taking away Linux support on the PS3…

    • kipo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can’t speak on the xperia 1 vi, but I have the 1 iii and the DAC is great.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 days ago

        You’d be surprised. Good quality compact DACs are very expensive unless the manufacturer engineers a better version.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Are they though?

          This isn’t the 90’s. All it needs to do us produce an analog stream.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            6 days ago

            It depends entirely on the quality of the drivers in the headphones and the listener. Portable USB DACs for audiophiles run upwards of $200.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Yes but they have much, much , much wider margins than cell phone manufacturers. Yes, phone manufacturers will add a $0.1 DAC/AMP chip instead of a $2 because of profit margins in the 100k unit range. The actual DAC IC chips that are very good are not too expensive. The metal housings are literally more expensive. It is not expensive at all to put a good chip in there, it is all the bean counters saying that they have to increase quarterly profits.

              Plus “audiophile” DACs are literally 80% snakeoil. Because listening is so subjective, they heavily rely on audiophiles’ quest for placebo effect and after-purchase self justification, both of which are a strong phenomenon. Above a FIIo E10k (literally uses a PCM5102, which is very cheap ), you get massive diminishing returns. Then above the ~150 or 200 mark, they all use very similar chips and just play around a bit with distortion on DAC/AMP stacks. Without distortion, there is no discernable difference between them.

              I was a signal integrity engineer for years, we can cleanly convert signals in the MHz range (>25x faster than audio signals) and process signals in the >5GHz range. Audio is literally child’s play to have near zero noise and 99% perfect analog conversion… Even a product I am working on now where the audio is medically needed to be a certain delay and fidelity to trigger biometric measurement feedback, the DAC chip is extremely cheap compared to “audiophile” gear…

              There is a reason why pretty much everyone fails a blind DAC comparison. If there were double-blind tests performed, probably like <1% of the audiophile population (that is already very low) that has extremely abnormal hearing would be able to tell DACs apart consistently above a fairly low threshold.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It isn’t so much power because that’s cheap and easy. It’s the hardware processing the data. A DAC is what decides whether or not sound is clear at any given volume, and the cheaper ones have a tendency to distort or otherwise suck as volume increases

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          That sounds like a dated idea. Modern hardware shouldn’t have any issues creating an audio stream.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I mean, there’s a difference in DACs. Creating one is pretty universal afaik, but they’re not all created equal.

            I have an old lgg7 that sounds great out of the box. My main phone, however, is a cheap oneplus, and it’s meh, but when I plug in an external DAC, the sound improves detectably, even to my old ears.

            My kid’s phone is some random nokia and sounds like crap, even through my best headphones, at high volume. Plug in the DAC, clear.

            It’s a thing. The on board DAC limits how volume affects sound quality for sure, and some don’t even need the volume up to start having audible breaks and distortion.

            Now, some of that is android. Crappy devices benefit from a player that has its own audio processing. You fiddle around in poweramp in particular, and you can usually get things to where it’s clear enough to be bearable at high volume. But there’s still a limit if the DAC isn’t solid. But a device that has a great DAC won’t have the issue at all unless you go crazy with the eq, which is possible on any hardware or software.

            My g7, maxed out, is clear as a bell at any volume, so long as the source file is good. Same with the external DAC. Both are true regardless of using the headphone jack or usbC for output, with headphones or a system (home or auto).

  • LennethAegis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m still using a Samsung S10e and its starting to show signs of wear, but I honestly don’t like any of the replacements I’ve seen that are under $1000 and I don’t want to spend that much on a phone. And unfortunately it looks hard to find older versions too.

    I tried looking into old version of the Asus ROG or Red Magic phones that still performed better than my S10e but even those were still so pricy.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m still running an s10e as well, God I love this phone. It might be the best phone ever made, I’m not joking. I’m on my third battery and second back glass but otherwise it feels like new.

      I did a little test with my dad, who has an iPhone from last year, where we would see how long a bunch of different apps would take to load. For all of them, my phone was within a second of load time (one or two was even faster). It hasn’t slowed down at all and it works flawlessly. Only problem now is it doesn’t get security updates anymore:(

    • gopher@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      S10e is great. It’s what I’ve been using as well, but it doesn’t get security updates anymore. Been using a custom rom which does get Android security updates, but there was a pretty serious SoC level security vulnerability which won’t get fixed for the S10e.

      I’ll get a Pixel 8a instead. No headphone jack, slightly larger, only 1 physical sim. But can run GrapheneOS and have a long promised update period.

      • LennethAegis@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, that’s the part I’m worried about. I have the US snapdragon S10e, which cannot be modded to extend it’s lifespan. Which is a mistake I hope to fix with my next phone.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Still mostly loving my cheap Motorola g84. Rarely use the headphone jack but it’s there. The stereo speakers in it are pretty good.

    Biggest gripe is it kills Facebook messenger in the background no matter what you do. WhatsApp unaffected though.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      it kills Facebook messenger in the background no matter what you do

      Sounds like a feature rather than a bug! Seriously though is it something like memory usage and fb wants way more resource? Is messenger light still a thing you can try instead?

      • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hehe. As a small town Facebook group admin, it’s useful to have it reliable, but not the end of the world.

        I don’t know for sure - my suspicion is that messenger relies on some other service which doesn’t appear in the battery optimisation UI and thus can’t be kept awake. (Opening the Facebook app causes Messenger to also wake up.)

        My previous Realme phone had the same issue.

  • jenny_ball@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    the Sony would be the perfect phone if it was rootable, in the usa, and was a pixel.

  • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Moto G Power 5g 2024 has been a great phone for me. Hard to find a phone with all the features but a headphone jack as well.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I want to throw Unihertz a shout-out. I only have the JellyPhone for its novelty, but as far as devices go, it does all the things an Android phone should, even with the silly form factor. It being stock Android is a big plus as well

    I can’t necessarily speak for their other phones, but if the build quality is the same, I really like what they’re doing.

    • florge@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Never heard of them before, but part of me wants a phone with a projector.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    My phone doesn’t have a headphone jack but has an FM radio. It took me ages to 1) realise I needed a pass through cable without a DAC and 2) find a pass-through cable without a DAC.

    • pirat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Does it use the cable wire as the antenna, and that didn’t work through an external DAC?

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yes exactly, so you need a special kind of usb-c adapter that doesn’t have an external DAC.

        Most adapters, even the cheapest, have a dac because a lot of phones (mostly iPhones) don’t support audio pass through mode.